[HarfBuzz] Itemising Japanese scripts
emuller at amazon.com
Sat Apr 30 03:06:35 UTC 2016
On 4/29/16 5:40 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
> How does that benefit you over having the OT script kana with the rule
> that its lookups must be able to support Han if the latter's
> characters are in the font?
The existence of an agreement is of course the most important thing.
'kana' would work, but it would be confusing, and we already have 'hani'
I suspect that font developers who have used 'kana' will have to touch
their fonts in many cases, so there may be little benefit in trying to
(If I were one of those, I would seriously consider putting all the
features under the DFLT script)
More information about the HarfBuzz