✗ CI.xeFULL: failure for tests/intel/kms_big_fb: Restrict runs on simulation (rev2)
Kamil Konieczny
kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com
Tue May 21 09:18:27 UTC 2024
Hi igt-dev,
On 2024-05-20 at 20:59:41 -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: tests/intel/kms_big_fb: Restrict runs on simulation (rev2)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/133797/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_7864_full -> XEIGTPW_11162_full
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_11162_full absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in XEIGTPW_11162_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
>
> Participating hosts (3 -> 2)
> ------------------------------
>
> Missing (1): shard-adlp
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_11162_full:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt at xe_exec_balancer@once-parallel-userptr-invalidate-race:
> - shard-dg2-set2: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] +1 other test fail
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7864/shard-dg2-464/igt@xe_exec_balancer@once-parallel-userptr-invalidate-race.html
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11162/shard-dg2-434/igt@xe_exec_balancer@once-parallel-userptr-invalidate-race.html
>
This is unrelated,
Regard,
Kamil
>
> #### Suppressed ####
>
> The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
> They do not affect the overall result.
>
> * igt at kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any:
> - {shard-lnl}: [PASS][3] -> [SKIP][4]
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7864/shard-lnl-1/igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any.html
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11162/shard-lnl-5/igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any.html
>
> * igt at kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-dpms-off-vs-modeset-interruptible:
> - {shard-lnl}: [SKIP][5] ([Intel XE#1421]) -> [FAIL][6]
> [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7864/shard-lnl-2/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-dpms-off-vs-modeset-interruptible.html
> [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11162/shard-lnl-4/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-dpms-off-vs-modeset-interruptible.html
>
> * igt at kms_flip@plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible at a-edp1:
> - {shard-lnl}: [PASS][7] -> [ABORT][8]
> [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7864/shard-lnl-4/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible@a-edp1.html
> [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11162/shard-lnl-5/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible@a-edp1.html
>
> * igt at kms_lease@multimaster-lease:
> - {shard-lnl}: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][9]
> [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11162/shard-lnl-4/igt@kms_lease@multimaster-lease.html
>
> * igt at kms_pm_rpm@drm-resources-equal:
> - {shard-lnl}: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][10]
> [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11162/shard-lnl-4/igt@kms_pm_rpm@drm-resources-equal.html
>
>
> Known issues
> ------------
>
> Here are the changes found in XEIGTPW_11162_full that come from known issues:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Issues hit ####
>
> * igt at core_hotunplug@hotrebind:
> - shard-dg2-set2: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][11] ([Intel XE#1548])
> [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11162/shard-dg2-464/igt@core_hotunplug@hotrebind.html
>
...cut...
>
> Build changes
> -------------
>
> * IGT: IGT_7864 -> IGTPW_11162
>
> IGTPW_11162: 11162
> IGT_7864: 8eff53c9664fa0abaa55b403c9f10f96260e44b7 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
> xe-1310-1ba62f8cea9c797427d45108df1d453f4b343240: 1ba62f8cea9c797427d45108df1d453f4b343240
>
> == Logs ==
>
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11162/index.html
More information about the I915-ci-infra
mailing list