Incorrect response address when using B4

[Daniel Gomez]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 05:09:54PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2024, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez at samsung.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I sent this patch [1] using B4 web endpoint and then I received a
> > response email to the wrong address: To: "Daniel Gomez via B4 Relay"
> > <devnull+da.gomez.samsung.com at kernel.org> instead of To: "Daniel Gomez"
> > <da.gomez at samsung.com>.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240925-macos-build-support-v3-1-233dda880e60@samsung.com/
> 
> I guess you're saying the replies should be using the Reply-To: header.

Exactly. Do you know if this can be fixed on the ci/patchwork bot?

> 
> Oddly enough, even my MUA doesn't respect the Reply-To: header when the
> same address is already in To:/Cc:, as a way to handle mailing list
> Reply-To "munging" [1].

My address was in Cc. B4 adds you in the To/Cc automatically unless you specify
no with '--not-me-too'.

Do you know if removing yourself from To/Cc makes ci/patchwork use the Reply-To
header?

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> [1] https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ce24ae2c-aec63371-ce252563-000babd9f1ba-20c0723eefd97920&q=1&e=ad8d684b-6634-4f39-87c0-216f0a44334f&u=http%3A%2F%2Fmarc.merlins.org%2Fnetrants%2Freply-to-harmful.html
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Is this something that can be fixed on the CI, patchwork side?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel