RE: ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dmc_wl: Do not check for DMC payload

[Ravali, JupallyX]

Hi,
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/143951/ -  Re-reported.
 
i915.CI.BAT - Re-reported.
 
Thanks,
Ravali.

-----Original Message-----
From: I915-ci-infra <i915-ci-infra-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Gustavo Sousa
Sent: 27 January 2025 19:01
To: I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dmc_wl: Do not check for DMC payload

Quoting Patchwork (2025-01-24 18:22:41-03:00)
>== Series Details ==
>
>Series: drm/i915/dmc_wl: Do not check for DMC payload
>URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/143951/
>State : failure
>
>== Summary ==
>
>CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16018 -> Patchwork_143951v1 
>====================================================
>
>Summary
>-------
>
>  **FAILURE**
>
>  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_143951v1 absolutely 
> need to be  verified manually.
>  
>  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes  
> introduced in Patchwork_143951v1, please notify your bug team 
> (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>  External URL: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_143951v1/index.html
>
>Participating hosts (38 -> 37)
>------------------------------
>
>  Missing    (1): fi-snb-2520m 
>
>Possible new issues
>-------------------
>
>  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_143951v1:
>
>### IGT changes ###
>
>#### Possible regressions ####
>
>  * igt at kms_pm_rpm@basic-rte:
>    - bat-apl-1:          [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
>   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16018/bat-apl-1/igt@kms_pm_rpm@basic-rte.html
>   [2]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_143951v1/bat-apl-1/
> igt at kms_pm_rpm@basic-rte.html

Hi CI Team,

DMC wakelock is not exercised for this platform. This should not be related to this patch.

Could you please re-report?

--
Gustavo Sousa