RE: ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/xe3lpd: Update bandwidth parameters (rev5)

[Ravali, JupallyX]

Hi,

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144441/ - Re-reported.
i915.CI.BAT - Re-reported.

Thanks,
Ravali.

-----Original Message-----
From: I915-ci-infra <i915-ci-infra-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Gustavo Sousa
Sent: 12 March 2025 20:09
To: I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/xe3lpd: Update bandwidth parameters (rev5)

Quoting Patchwork (2025-03-11 15:45:55-03:00)
>== Series Details ==
>
>Series: drm/i915/xe3lpd: Update bandwidth parameters (rev5)
>URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144441/
>State : failure
>
>== Summary ==
>
>CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16263 -> Patchwork_144441v5 
>====================================================
>
>Summary
>-------
>
>  **FAILURE**
>
>  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_144441v5 absolutely 
> need to be  verified manually.
>  
>  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes  
> introduced in Patchwork_144441v5, please notify your bug team 
> (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>  External URL: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144441v5/index.html
>
>Participating hosts (43 -> 43)
>------------------------------
>
>  Additional (1): bat-arlh-2 
>  Missing    (1): fi-snb-2520m 
>
>Possible new issues
>-------------------
>
>  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_144441v5:
>
>### IGT changes ###
>
>#### Possible regressions ####

Hi, CI Team.

The errors below are not related to my series. Could you please re-report?

Also, please see my comments below.

>
>  * igt at i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
>    - bat-adls-6:         [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
>   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16263/bat-adls-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
>   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144441v5/bat-adls-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
>    - bat-rpls-4:         [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4]
>   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16263/bat-rpls-4/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
>   [4]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144441v5/bat-rpls-4
> /igt at i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html

This maps to
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/13901.

>
>  * igt at kms_addfb_basic@too-high:
>    - fi-kbl-8809g:       NOTRUN -> [FAIL][5] +3 other tests fail
>   [5]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144441v5/fi-kbl-880
> 9g/igt at kms_addfb_basic@too-high.html

I see amdgpu in the dmesg out. How come?

>
>  * igt at kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
>    - bat-apl-1:          [PASS][6] -> [DMESG-WARN][7] +1 other test dmesg-warn
>   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16263/bat-apl-1/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank.html
>   [7]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144441v5/bat-apl-1/
> igt at kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank.html

I'm not familiar with LSPCON, but, at a quick glance on where lspcon functions are called, the error seems unrelated to intel_bw.c, thus unrelated to this series.

>
>  * igt at kms_force_connector_basic@force-connector-state:
>    - fi-kbl-8809g:       NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][8]
>   [8]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144441v5/fi-kbl-880
> 9g/igt at kms_force_connector_basic@force-connector-state.html

Again, amdgpu in the logs here.

>
>  * igt at kms_force_connector_basic@force-edid:
>    - fi-kbl-8809g:       NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][9]
>   [9]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144441v5/fi-kbl-880
> 9g/igt at kms_force_connector_basic@force-edid.html
>

And amdgpu in the logs here as well.

--
Gustavo Sousa