[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 2/2] tests/gem_eio: Add reset and unwedge stress testing
Antonio Argenziano
antonio.argenziano at intel.com
Tue Apr 3 18:24:47 UTC 2018
On 03/04/18 04:36, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>
> Reset and unwedge stress testing is supposed to trigger wedging or resets
> at incovenient times and then re-use the context so either the context or
> driver tracking might get confused and break.
>
> v2:
> * Renamed for more sensible naming.
> * Added some comments to explain what the test is doing. (Chris Wilson)
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/gem_eio.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_eio.c b/tests/gem_eio.c
> index b7c5047f0816..9599e73db736 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_eio.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_eio.c
> @@ -591,6 +591,74 @@ static void test_inflight_internal(int fd, unsigned int wait)
> close(fd);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Verify that we can submit and execute work after unwedging the GPU.
> + */
> +static void test_reset_stress(int fd, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + uint32_t ctx0 = gem_context_create(fd);
> +
> + igt_until_timeout(5) {
> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf = { };
> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = { };
> + uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> + igt_spin_t *hang;
> + unsigned int i;
> + uint32_t ctx;
> +
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
> +
> + igt_require(i915_reset_control(flags & TEST_WEDGE ?
> + false : true));
> +
> + ctx = context_create_safe(fd);
> +
> + /*
> + * Start executing a spin batch with some queued batches
> + * against a different context after it.
> + */
Aren't all batches queued on ctx0? Or is this a reference to the check
on ctx you have later in the test.
Thanks,
Antonio
> + hang = spin_sync(fd, ctx0, 0);
> +
> + obj.handle = gem_create(fd, 4096);
> + gem_write(fd, obj.handle, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe));
> +
> + execbuf.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj);
> + execbuf.buffer_count = 1;
> + execbuf.rsvd1 = ctx0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> + gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf);
> +
> + /* Wedge after a small delay. */
> + igt_assert_eq(__check_wait(fd, obj.handle, 100e3), 0);
> +
> + /* Unwedge by forcing a reset. */
> + igt_assert(i915_reset_control(true));
> + trigger_reset(fd);
> +
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
> +
> + /*
> + * Verify that we are able to submit work after unwedging from
> + * both contexts.
> + */
> + execbuf.rsvd1 = ctx;
> + for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
> + gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf);
> +
> + execbuf.rsvd1 = ctx0;
> + for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
> + gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf);
> +
> + gem_sync(fd, obj.handle);
> + igt_spin_batch_free(fd, hang);
> + gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx);
> + gem_close(fd, obj.handle);
> + }
> +
> + gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx0);
> +}
> +
> static int fd = -1;
>
> static void
> @@ -635,6 +703,12 @@ igt_main
> igt_subtest("in-flight-suspend")
> test_inflight_suspend(fd);
>
> + igt_subtest("reset-stress")
> + test_reset_stress(fd, 0);
> +
> + igt_subtest("unwedge-stress")
> + test_reset_stress(fd, TEST_WEDGE);
> +
> igt_subtest_group {
> const struct {
> unsigned int wait;
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list