[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 07/20] tests/psr: Kill MMAP_GTT_WAITING
Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com
Mon Apr 16 21:44:02 UTC 2018
On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 13:11 +0200, Katarzyna Dec wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 07:37:19PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > No PSR event should take 10s, don't see value in this test.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 25 -------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
> > index 94134b7d..d9cce5ea 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
> > @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ bool running_with_psr_disabled;
> > enum operations {
> > PAGE_FLIP,
> > MMAP_GTT,
> > - MMAP_GTT_WAITING,
> > MMAP_CPU,
> > BLT,
> > RENDER,
> > @@ -52,7 +51,6 @@ static const char *op_str(enum operations op)
> > static const char * const name[] = {
> > [PAGE_FLIP] = "page_flip",
> > [MMAP_GTT] = "mmap_gtt",
> > - [MMAP_GTT_WAITING] = "mmap_gtt_waiting",
> > [MMAP_CPU] = "mmap_cpu",
> > [BLT] = "blt",
> > [RENDER] = "render",
> > @@ -319,29 +317,6 @@ static void run_test(data_t *data)
> > munmap(ptr, data->mod_size);
> > expected = "BLACK or TRANSPARENT mark on top of plane in test";
> > break;
> > - case MMAP_GTT_WAITING:
> > - ptr = gem_mmap__gtt(data->drm_fd, handle, data->mod_size,
> > - PROT_WRITE);
> > - gem_set_domain(data->drm_fd, handle,
> > - I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
> > -
> > - /* Printing white on white so the screen shouldn't change */
> > - memset(ptr, 0xff, data->mod_size);
> > - get_sink_crc(data, crc);
> > - if (data->test_plane == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY)
> > - assert_or_manual(strncmp(ref_crc, crc, CRC_LEN) == 0, "screen WHITE");
> > - else
> > - assert_or_manual(strncmp(ref_crc, crc, CRC_LEN) == 0,
> > - "GREEN background with WHITE box");
> > -
> > - igt_info("Waiting 10s...\n");
> > - sleep(10);
> Is this time too long? Couldn't we decrease that? Or maybe that is not a point.
> Why this subtest is not relevant any more?
I believe the test was relevant in the past when the feature was being
developed, perhaps there was a driver bug back then.
Like I wrote in the commit message, no PSR event takes 10s to happen, so
there is no point in having this test.
Cc: Rodrigo, who wrote these tests.
> Kasia
> > -
> > - /* Now lets print black to change the screen */
> > - memset(ptr, 0, data->mod_size);
> > - munmap(ptr, data->mod_size);
> > - expected = "BLACK or TRANSPARENT mark on top of plane in test";
> > - break;
> > case MMAP_CPU:
> > ptr = gem_mmap__cpu(data->drm_fd, handle, 0, data->mod_size,
> > PROT_WRITE);
> > --
> > 2.14.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > igt-dev mailing list
> > igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list