[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 07/20] tests/psr: Kill MMAP_GTT_WAITING

[Dhinakaran Pandiyan]

On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 13:11 +0200, Katarzyna Dec wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 07:37:19PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > No PSR event should take 10s, don't see value in this test.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 25 -------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
> > index 94134b7d..d9cce5ea 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
> > @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ bool running_with_psr_disabled;
> >  enum operations {
> >  	PAGE_FLIP,
> >  	MMAP_GTT,
> > -	MMAP_GTT_WAITING,
> >  	MMAP_CPU,
> >  	BLT,
> >  	RENDER,
> > @@ -52,7 +51,6 @@ static const char *op_str(enum operations op)
> >  	static const char * const name[] = {
> >  		[PAGE_FLIP] = "page_flip",
> >  		[MMAP_GTT] = "mmap_gtt",
> > -		[MMAP_GTT_WAITING] = "mmap_gtt_waiting",
> >  		[MMAP_CPU] = "mmap_cpu",
> >  		[BLT] = "blt",
> >  		[RENDER] = "render",
> > @@ -319,29 +317,6 @@ static void run_test(data_t *data)
> >  		munmap(ptr, data->mod_size);
> >  		expected = "BLACK or TRANSPARENT mark on top of plane in test";
> >  		break;
> > -	case MMAP_GTT_WAITING:
> > -		ptr = gem_mmap__gtt(data->drm_fd, handle, data->mod_size,
> > -				    PROT_WRITE);
> > -		gem_set_domain(data->drm_fd, handle,
> > -			       I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
> > -
> > -		/* Printing white on white so the screen shouldn't change */
> > -		memset(ptr, 0xff, data->mod_size);
> > -		get_sink_crc(data, crc);
> > -		if (data->test_plane == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY)
> > -			assert_or_manual(strncmp(ref_crc, crc, CRC_LEN) == 0, "screen WHITE");
> > -		else
> > -			assert_or_manual(strncmp(ref_crc, crc, CRC_LEN) == 0,
> > -			       "GREEN background with WHITE box");
> > -
> > -		igt_info("Waiting 10s...\n");
> > -		sleep(10);
> Is this time too long? Couldn't we decrease that? Or maybe that is not a point.
> Why this subtest is not relevant any more?


I believe the test was relevant in the past when the feature was being
developed, perhaps there was a driver bug back then.

Like I wrote in the commit message, no PSR event takes 10s to happen, so
there is no point in having this test.

Cc: Rodrigo, who wrote these tests.



> Kasia
> > -
> > -		/* Now lets print black to change the screen */
> > -		memset(ptr, 0, data->mod_size);
> > -		munmap(ptr, data->mod_size);
> > -		expected = "BLACK or TRANSPARENT mark on top of plane in test";
> > -		break;
> >  	case MMAP_CPU:
> >  		ptr = gem_mmap__cpu(data->drm_fd, handle, 0, data->mod_size,
> >  				    PROT_WRITE);
> > -- 
> > 2.14.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > igt-dev mailing list
> > igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev