[igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] intel-ci: Exclude pm_rpm module-reload from full testing

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Petri Latvala (2018-08-16 09:43:10)
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 09:00:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Petri Latvala (2018-08-16 08:56:27)
> > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 07:06:46AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > The pm_rpm module-reload exists to exercise a rpm wakeref leak, and
> > > > affects the random selection of tests run after it. Similar to the
> > > > normal module-reload tests, care must be taken in its execution to avoid
> > > > causing spurious failures elsewhere.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > > ---
> > > >  tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 1 +
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > > index c93554a37..88b2fe313 100644
> > > > --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ igt at drm_mm(@.*)?
> > > >  # failures in tests run afterwards.
> > > >  ###############################################
> > > >  igt at drv_module_reload(@.*)?
> > > > +igt at pm_rpm@module-reload
> > > 
> > > 
> > > As we don't have machinery in place yet to run these reloading tests
> > > in shards in a controlled manner, should this be added to
> > > fast-feedback to not lose the coverage entirely?
> > 
> > It already is in fast-feedback awaiting us landing the wakeref fix. :-p
> 
> 
> Blindness is bad, kids.
> 
> 
> Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>

Got an irc r-b from Imre for the pm_rpm/module-reload fix, so pushed all
3. All that we have to do now is to fix the wakeref and rejoice in a
green BAT.
-Chris