[igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3] tests/gem_reset_stats: Fix retrieval of hangcheck stats expectation

Antonio Argenziano antonio.argenziano at intel.com
Fri Jan 26 00:52:43 UTC 2018



On 17/01/18 09:42, Antonio Argenziano wrote:
> 
> 
> On 17/01/18 02:06, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:56:51PM -0800, Antonio Argenziano wrote:
>>> The test expected IOCTL 'I915_GET_RESET_STATS' would return an error
>>> when not root. That is no longer true in the driver since commit
>>> 4c9c0d09741d ("drm/i915: Fix retrieval of hangcheck stats") and 
>>> therefore
>>> the test was incorrectly failing.
>>>
>>> v2:
>>>     - Add the commit that changed the behaviour in the Driver to the
>>>       commit message. (Michel)
>>>
>>> v3:
>>>     - Reuse get_reset_count instead of implementing a new function.
>>>       (Michel)
>>>
>>> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano at intel.com>
> 
> This revision of the patch has already been reviewed on intel-gfx, 
> pasting RB here.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>

Can we merge this?

Thanks,
Antonio

> 
>>
>> Please remember to send igt patches to the new mailing list in the 
>> future.
>> Adding it.
>> -Daniel
>>> ---
>>>   tests/gem_reset_stats.c | 14 ++++++--------
>>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/gem_reset_stats.c b/tests/gem_reset_stats.c
>>> index edc40767..17a9b648 100644
>>> --- a/tests/gem_reset_stats.c
>>> +++ b/tests/gem_reset_stats.c
>>> @@ -605,10 +605,7 @@ static void test_reset_count(const struct 
>>> intel_execution_engine *e,
>>>           c2 = get_reset_count(fd, ctx);
>>> -        if (ctx == 0)
>>> -            igt_assert(c2 == -EPERM);
>>> -        else
>>> -            igt_assert(c2 == 0);
>>> +        igt_assert(c2 == 0);
>>>       }
>>>       igt_waitchildren();
>>> @@ -644,10 +641,11 @@ static void _check_param_ctx(const int fd, 
>>> const int ctx, const cap_t cap)
>>>       const uint32_t bad = rand() + 1;
>>>       if (ctx == 0) {
>>> -        if (cap == root)
>>> -            igt_assert_eq(_test_params(fd, ctx, 0, 0), 0);
>>> -        else
>>> -            igt_assert_eq(_test_params(fd, ctx, 0, 0), -EPERM);
>>> +        igt_assert_eq(_test_params(fd, ctx, 0, 0), 0);
>>> +
>>> +        if (cap != root) {
>>> +            igt_assert(get_reset_count(fd, ctx) == 0);
>>> +        }
>>>       }
>>>       igt_assert_eq(_test_params(fd, ctx, 0, bad), -EINVAL);
>>> -- 
>>> 2.14.2
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev


More information about the igt-dev mailing list