[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 3/4] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Convert test to use igt_display, v3.
Arkadiusz Hiler
arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com
Wed Mar 7 15:26:58 UTC 2018
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:17:37PM +0200, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 09:52:31AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > Straight conversion, no behavioral changes yet.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Handle 2x outputs correctly.
> > Changes since v2:
> > - Set correct parameters in set_mode_for_params, so atomic commit for
> > 2x outputs doesn't scale.
> > - Fix accidental scaling in set_prim_plane_for_params.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>
> Generally the conversion looks good to me, but I can't slap r-b
> yet because there are those new fails:
>
>
> Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
> Subgroup fbc-2p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-render:
> pass -> FAIL (shard-hsw)
> Subgroup fbc-2p-scndscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt:
> pass -> FAIL (shard-hsw)
> Subgroup fbc-2p-scndscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt:
> pass -> FAIL (shard-hsw)
>
>
> There's even a bug for that (fdo#101623), but we never had hit the issue
> with those particular 3 tests before, so they are not suppressed by the
> cibuglog.
>
> I've done a CI rerun to make sure it's consistent (and it is, 2/2 :-))
> and I've tried to figure out why we hit the issue with your changes
> while I was doing the review, but I haven't spotted anything suspicious.
On a second thought it may be the optimizations from the 4th patch
making the issue more consistent.
I'll send the first three patches to get a round of CI treatment.
--
Cheers,
Arek
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list