[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/i915_query: split garbage test
Lofstedt, Marta
marta.lofstedt at intel.com
Tue Mar 13 11:12:02 UTC 2018
Well, yes
we won't get results on the query-garbage-items util we have results to diff with, better just send it up
/Marta
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Landwerlin, Lionel G
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 1:08 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofstedt at intel.com>; Chris Wilson <chris at chris-
> wilson.co.uk>; igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/i915_query: split garbage test
>
> Rb for the whole series? :)
>
> On 13/03/18 11:05, Lofstedt, Marta wrote:
> > CI results are looking good.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt at intel.com>
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: igt-dev [mailto:igt-dev-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Lionel Landwerlin
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:37 PM
> >> To: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>;
> >> igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/i915_query: split
> >> garbage test
> >>
> >> On 13/03/18 09:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-03-13 09:17:55)
> >>>> Unfortunately I forgot that some of those tests require rcs
> >>>> topology support which we don't have on Sandybridge. This change
> >>>> split the test in 2 (first part available on all platforms, second
> >>>> part only with rcs topology support).
> >>>>
> >>>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105475
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
> >>> Aside, why are the flags prefixed with DRM_I915_QUERY and not just
> >>> I915_QUERY matching the rest of the uAPI? In fact, the whole perf
> >>> abi is special. ARGH.
> >> Argh...
> >>
> >> Is it too late for to send a fix?
> >>
> >> Since it's only one DRM_I915_QUERY_TOPOLOGY_INFO, can we add a
> new
> >> define properly named an make the wrongly named one a macro to that?
> >> And make sure it doesn't happen in the future? (at least for this
> >> define)
> >>
> >> Thanks for the review.
> >>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> tests/i915_query.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> >>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/tests/i915_query.c b/tests/i915_query.c index
> >>>> 328c54bc..c7de8cbd 100644
> >>>> --- a/tests/i915_query.c
> >>>> +++ b/tests/i915_query.c
> >>>> @@ -69,9 +69,7 @@ static bool has_query_supports(int fd)
> >>>> static void test_query_garbage(int fd)
> >>>> {
> >>>> struct drm_i915_query query;
> >>>> - struct drm_i915_query_item items[2];
> >>>> - struct drm_i915_query_item *items_ptr;
> >>>> - int i, n_items;
> >>>> + struct drm_i915_query_item item;
> >>>>
> >>>> /* Verify that invalid query pointers are rejected. */
> >>>> igt_assert_eq(__i915_query(fd, NULL), -EFAULT); @@ -90,8
> >>>> +88,15 @@ static void test_query_garbage(int fd)
> >>>> i915_query_items_err(fd, (void *) 0, 1, EFAULT);
> >>>>
> >>>> /* Test the invalid query id = 0. */
> >>>> - memset(items, 0, sizeof(items));
> >>>> - i915_query_items_err(fd, items, 1, EINVAL);
> >>>> + memset(&item, 0, sizeof(item));
> >>>> + i915_query_items_err(fd, &item, 1, EINVAL); }
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static void test_query_garbage_items(int fd) {
> >>>> + struct drm_i915_query_item items[2];
> >>>> + struct drm_i915_query_item *items_ptr;
> >>>> + int i, n_items;
> >>>>
> >>>> /*
> >>>> * Query item flags field is currently valid only if equals to 0.
> >>>> @@ -486,6 +491,11 @@ igt_main
> >>>> igt_subtest("query-garbage")
> >>>> test_query_garbage(fd);
> >>>>
> >>>> + igt_subtest("query-garbage-items") {
> >>>> + igt_require(query_topology_supported(fd));
> >>>> + test_query_garbage_items(fd);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> igt_subtest("query-topology-kernel-writes") {
> >>>> igt_require(query_topology_supported(fd));
> >>>> test_query_topology_kernel_writes(fd);
> >>> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> igt-dev mailing list
> >> igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list