[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] blacklist: Don't run DRRS test on Intel CI system
Lofstedt, Marta
marta.lofstedt at intel.com
Tue Mar 27 10:06:16 UTC 2018
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiler, Arkadiusz
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 12:15 PM
> To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofstedt at intel.com>; igt-
> dev at lists.freedesktop.org; Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>; Latvala,
> Petri <petri.latvala at intel.com>; Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
> Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] blacklist: Don't run DRRS test on Intel CI
> system
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 03:22:56PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > Op 26-03-18 om 08:29 schreef Marta Lofstedt:
> > > Skipping takes time, specifically for the big amount of drrs related
> > > kms_frontbuffer_tracking tests. Since we currently don't have any
> > > system set up with DRRS panels, blacklisting all those test will
> > > save time, and we can avoid the need to increase the Jenkins timeout
> > > in order to solve the Bugzilla below.
> > >
> > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
> > > Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt index 7ca313ac..0a8506ca 100644
> > > --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ igt at gem_tiled_swapping@(?!non-threaded).*
> > > igt at gem_userptr_blits@(major|minor|forked|mlocked|swapping).*
> > > igt at gem_wait@.*hang.*
> > > igt at gem_write_read_ring_switch(@.*)?
> > > +igt at kms_frontbuffer_tracking@.*drrs*
>
> I think we should start annotating those, so the reevaluation would be easier
> than 'git blame'-ing the file and going through each commit.
>
> > > ###############################################
> > > # Broadcom
> > > ###############################################
> > Hm a single skipped test should take about 100 ms, but I do notice we
> > probe all outputs in igt_display_init, so could this also be fixed by
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/212983/ ?
> >
> > This should reduce probing to the minimum.
>
> Note the discussion around this patch:
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/204944/
>
> The idea was to start async probe during the boot, so we won't depend on
> the fbdev to do the initial probing.
>
> But it seems that, after all, UNKNOWN is still a thing. I should have checked
> myself...
>
> I've pulled the numbers for your change:
>
> CI_DRM_3978 IGTPW_1192
> shard-apl 12982s 12783s
> shard-hsw 11735s 11560s
> shard-snb 7033s 6906s
> shard-kbl 9843s 9048s
>
Thanks for numbers Arek.
However, my main motivation for doing this is to avoid increasing 18 minutes Jenkins timeout in bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
> Looks good.
>
> Note: those are the combined runtimes, so the actual wall-clock time saving
> for our CI is less than that (because shading).
>
> -Arek
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list