[igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/gem_ctx_exec: Exercise I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_RECOVERABLE
Mika Kuoppala
mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Thu Oct 4 13:26:16 UTC 2018
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> When RECOVERABLE is set, the kernel will attempt to automatically recover
> a context after a hang. But if it is unset, the kernel will ban the
> guilty context on a hang, preventing subsequent execution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> tests/gem_ctx_exec.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_exec.c b/tests/gem_ctx_exec.c
> index 908b59af..1cd3b20e 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_ctx_exec.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_ctx_exec.c
> @@ -147,6 +147,41 @@ static void invalid_context(int fd, unsigned ring, uint32_t handle)
> igt_assert_eq(__gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf), -ENOENT);
> }
>
> +static void norecovery(int i915)
> +{
> + for (int pass = 1; pass >= 0; pass--) {
> + struct drm_i915_gem_context_param param = {
> + .ctx_id = gem_context_create(i915),
> + .param = 0x7,
> + .value = pass,
> + };
> + int expect = pass == 0 ? -EIO : 0;
> + igt_spin_t *spin;
> +
> + if (pass)
> + igt_require(__gem_context_set_param(i915, ¶m) == 0);
> + else
> + gem_context_set_param(i915, ¶m);
You are trying in here to make the asserts unique?
> + gem_context_get_param(i915, ¶m);
> + igt_assert_eq(param.value, pass);
> +
> + spin = __igt_spin_batch_new(i915,
> + .ctx = param.ctx_id,
> + .flags = IGT_SPIN_POLL_RUN);
> + igt_assert(spin->running);
> +
> + while (!READ_ONCE(*spin->running))
> + ;
wait that it is running...
> + igt_force_gpu_reset(i915);
> +
then reset.
> + igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
> + igt_assert_eq(__gem_execbuf(i915, &spin->execbuf), expect);
Hmm where do we sync with hang resolution. Is it the handoff in
the wedged debugfs entry?
-Mika
> + igt_spin_batch_free(i915, spin);
> +
> + gem_context_destroy(i915, param.ctx_id);
> + }
> +}
> +
> igt_main
> {
> const uint32_t batch[2] = { 0, MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END };
> @@ -190,6 +225,9 @@ igt_main
> igt_subtest("eviction")
> big_exec(fd, handle, 0);
>
> + igt_subtest("norecovery")
> + norecovery(fd);
> +
> igt_subtest("reset-pin-leak") {
> int i;
>
> --
> 2.19.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list