[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] igt: Check drmModeGetResources()

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-10-04 14:27:05)
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 03:44:46PM +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 08:43:49PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > If KMS is not supported on the device, drmModeGetResources() will return
> > > NULL, often this is an indication that we should not attempt to run the
> > > test. Although it would be preferred to use something like
> > > igt_require_display() as the canonical check and assert that
> > > drmModeGetResources() did not hit an error, it is not always practical
> > > as the tests do not utilize the common igt_display abstraction.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Reviewed-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
> > 
> > and pushed
> 
> I still think a kmstest_require() or so, plus then removing the pile of
> add-how igt_require we just sprinkled all over, would be more maintainable
> long term. kmstest_require() would also allow us to drop a not-so-cryptic
> message into logs.

But what does kmstest mean? igt_require_kms(), which can be the raw
drm_mode_getresources ioctl, matches my expectations of a lowlevel check.
But is that as descriptive for the tests that are just using
drmModeGetResources() directly? That is the conundrum.
-Chris