[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests: Skip testdisplay when KMS is disabled

Souza, Jose jose.souza at intel.com
Mon Oct 15 21:52:25 UTC 2018


On Sat, 2018-10-13 at 11:25 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting José Roberto de Souza (2018-10-12 22:28:27)
> > This test should be skiped when KMS is disabled.
> > 
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/testdisplay.c | 5 +----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Testdisplay is really an oddball that doesn't belong amid the igt
> suite
> of tests/
> 
> > diff --git a/tests/testdisplay.c b/tests/testdisplay.c
> > index b13c3d70..9972fb3c 100644
> > --- a/tests/testdisplay.c
> > +++ b/tests/testdisplay.c
> > @@ -457,10 +457,7 @@ int update_display(bool probe)
> >         int c;
> >  
> >         resources = drmModeGetResources(drm_fd);
> > -       if (!resources) {
> > -               igt_warn("drmModeGetResources failed: %s\n",
> > strerror(errno));
> > -               return 0;
> > -       }
> > +       igt_require(resources);
> 
> Hmm, looks like there's a drmSetClientCap() that would fail earlier.
> I
> think ideally we would pass resources into the function.
> 
> For now, this is a simple improvement
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> Fwiw,
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/254962/
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/254961/
> are the remaining issues for BAT + no display.


Thanks. Could someone merge this 2?
I'm waiting the GitLab migration to ask commit rights.

> -Chris


More information about the igt-dev mailing list