[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] prime_vgem: Downgrade the severity of a single missed vblank on flipping
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Apr 4 07:05:37 UTC 2019
Not displaying the flip on the next vblank is bad, but not the end of
the world -- so long as that is only a temporary glitch. Give the vblank
a few more frames to complete, and warn instead of failing if it takes
more than one vblank interval to flip.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/prime_vgem.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/prime_vgem.c b/tests/prime_vgem.c
index 85a27b69f..8c0dd6c7a 100644
--- a/tests/prime_vgem.c
+++ b/tests/prime_vgem.c
@@ -713,15 +713,23 @@ static void flip_to_vgem(int i915, int vgem,
/* And then the flip is completed as soon as it is ready */
if (!hang) {
- union drm_wait_vblank wait;
+ unsigned long miss;
- memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait));
- wait.request.type = DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | pipe_select(0);
- wait.request.sequence = 10;
- do_or_die(drmIoctl(i915, DRM_IOCTL_WAIT_VBLANK, &wait));
-
- vgem_fence_signal(vgem, fence);
+ /* Signal fence at the start of then next vblank */
get_vblank(i915, 0, DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS);
+ vgem_fence_signal(vgem, fence);
+
+ miss = 0;
+ igt_until_timeout(5) {
+ get_vblank(i915, 0, DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS);
+ if (poll(&pfd, 1, 0))
+ break;
+ miss++;
+ }
+ if (miss) {
+ igt_warn("Missed %lu vblanks after signaling before flip was completed\n",
+ miss);
+ }
igt_assert_eq(poll(&pfd, 1, 0), 1);
}
--
2.20.1
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list