[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_plane_multiple: before going testing check how many planes are allowed
Maarten Lankhorst
maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com
Thu Apr 11 08:35:22 UTC 2019
Op 09-04-2019 om 13:47 schreef Juha-Pekka Heikkila:
> On 9.4.2019 4.29, Souza, Jose wrote:
>> On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 17:55 +0300, Juha-Pekka Heikkila wrote:
>>> before start testing try out how many planes kernel will
>>> allow simultaneously to be used.
>>>
>>> v2 (Jose Souza, Daniel Vetter): Fix resource leaks. Randomize
>>> used planes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> tests/kms_plane_multiple.c | 88
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/kms_plane_multiple.c b/tests/kms_plane_multiple.c
>>> index bfaeede..f2707dc 100644
>>> --- a/tests/kms_plane_multiple.c
>>> +++ b/tests/kms_plane_multiple.c
>>> @@ -80,16 +80,6 @@ static void test_fini(data_t *data, igt_output_t
>>> *output, int n_planes)
>>> {
>>> igt_pipe_crc_stop(data->pipe_crc);
>>> - for (int i = 0; i < n_planes; i++) {
>>> - igt_plane_t *plane = data->plane[i];
>>> - if (!plane)
>>> - continue;
>>> - if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY)
>>> - continue;
>>> - igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
>>> - data->plane[i] = NULL;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> /* reset the constraint on the pipe */
>>> igt_output_set_pipe(output, PIPE_ANY);
>>> @@ -99,7 +89,8 @@ static void test_fini(data_t *data, igt_output_t
>>> *output, int n_planes)
>>> free(data->plane);
>>> data->plane = NULL;
>>> - igt_remove_fb(data->drm_fd, data->fb);
>>> + free(data->fb);
>>> + data->fb = NULL;
>>> igt_display_reset(&data->display);
>>> }
>>> @@ -195,6 +186,7 @@ prepare_planes(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe_id,
>>> color_t *color,
>>> int *y;
>>> int *size;
>>> int i;
>>> + int* suffle;
>>> igt_output_set_pipe(output, pipe_id);
>>> primary = igt_output_get_plane_type(output,
>>> DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY);
>>> @@ -206,6 +198,34 @@ prepare_planes(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe_id,
>>> color_t *color,
>>> igt_assert_f(y, "Failed to allocate %ld bytes for variable
>>> y\n", (long int) (pipe->n_planes * sizeof(*y)));
>>> size = malloc(pipe->n_planes * sizeof(*size));
>>> igt_assert_f(size, "Failed to allocate %ld bytes for variable
>>> size\n", (long int) (pipe->n_planes * sizeof(*size)));
>>> + suffle = malloc(pipe->n_planes * sizeof(*suffle));
>>> + igt_assert_f(suffle, "Failed to allocate %ld bytes for variable
>>> size\n", (long int) (pipe->n_planes * sizeof(*suffle)));
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < pipe->n_planes; i++)
>>> + suffle[i] = i;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * suffle table for planes. using rand() should keep it
>>> + * 'randomized in expected way'
>>> + */
>>> + for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
>>
>> Not beautiful at all
>>
>>> + int n, m;
>>> + int a, b;
>>> +
>>> + n = rand() % (pipe->n_planes-1);
>>> + m = rand() % (pipe->n_planes-1);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * keep primary plane at its place for test's sake.
>>> + */
>>> + if(n == primary->index || m == primary->index)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + a = suffle[n];
>>> + b = suffle[m];
>>> + suffle[n] = b;
>>> + suffle[m] = a;
>>> + }
>>> mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
>>> @@ -213,7 +233,11 @@ prepare_planes(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe_id,
>>> color_t *color,
>>> x[primary->index] = 0;
>>> y[primary->index] = 0;
>>> for (i = 0; i < max_planes; i++) {
>>> - igt_plane_t *plane = igt_output_get_plane(output, i);
>>> + /*
>>> + * Here is made assumption primary plane will have
>>> + * index zero.
>>> + */
>>> + igt_plane_t *plane = igt_output_get_plane(output,
>>> suffle[i]);
>>> uint32_t plane_format;
>>> uint64_t plane_tiling;
>>> @@ -251,6 +275,10 @@ prepare_planes(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe_id,
>>> color_t *color,
>>> create_fb_for_mode_position(data, output, mode, color, x, y,
>>> size, size, tiling, max_planes);
>>> igt_plane_set_fb(data->plane[primary->index], &data-
>>>> fb[primary->index]);
>>> + free((void*)x);
>>> + free((void*)y);
>>> + free((void*)size);
>>> + free((void*)suffle);
>>> }
>>> static void
>>> @@ -260,7 +288,9 @@ test_plane_position_with_output(data_t *data,
>>> enum pipe pipe,
>>> {
>>> color_t blue = { 0.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f };
>>> igt_crc_t crc;
>>> + igt_plane_t *plane;
>>> int i;
>>> + int err, c = 0;
>>> int iterations = opt.iterations < 1 ? 1 : opt.iterations;
>>> bool loop_forever;
>>> char info[256];
>>> @@ -274,22 +304,46 @@ test_plane_position_with_output(data_t *data,
>>> enum pipe pipe,
>>> iterations, iterations > 1 ? "iterations" :
>>> "iteration");
>>> }
>>> - igt_info("Testing connector %s using pipe %s with %d planes %s
>>> with seed %d\n",
>>> - igt_output_name(output), kmstest_pipe_name(pipe),
>>> n_planes,
>>> - info, opt.seed);
>>> -
>>> test_init(data, pipe, n_planes);
>>> test_grab_crc(data, output, pipe, &blue, tiling);
>>> + /*
>>> + * Find out how many planes are allowed simultaneously
>>> + */
>>> + do {
>>> + c++;
>>
>> Adding one plane at time is a waste of CI time in platforms without a
>> high number of planes(anything besides ICL), better start with max and
>> decreasing until commit is accepted.
>>
>
> I'd rather not try to hammer in configurations which may not work, that's not what we're testing here. Time anyways is less than 6 frames per loop so I don't think we are really wasting time.
This is the whole point of atomic though. With the try_commit_atomic(TEST_ONLY | ALLOW_MODESET) mentioned by Jose you're not wasting any time in finding a configuration that works.. We don't need to commit it to HW, only have to test in sw. :)
~Maarten
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list