[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_mmap_gtt: Markup a copy of GTT set-domains

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 02:27:57PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We have to control the cache domains, especially important before first
> writing into the object.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>  tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c b/tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c
> index 58922ee32..ab7d3f2d0 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c
> @@ -678,27 +678,26 @@ test_huge_copy(int fd, int huge, int tiling_a, int tiling_b, int ncpus)
>  
>  	igt_fork(child, ncpus) {
>  		uint64_t valid_size = huge_object_size;
> -		uint32_t bo;
> +		uint32_t bo[2];
>  		char *a, *b;
>  
> -		bo = gem_create(fd, huge_object_size);
> +		bo[0] = gem_create(fd, huge_object_size);
>  		if (tiling_a) {
> -			igt_require(__gem_set_tiling(fd, bo, abs(tiling_a), min_tile_width(devid, tiling_a)) == 0);
> +			igt_require(__gem_set_tiling(fd, bo[0], abs(tiling_a), min_tile_width(devid, tiling_a)) == 0);
>  			valid_size = rounddown(valid_size, tile_row_size(tiling_a, min_tile_width(devid, tiling_a)));
>  		}
> -		a = __gem_mmap__gtt(fd, bo, huge_object_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> +		a = __gem_mmap__gtt(fd, bo[0], huge_object_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
>  		igt_require(a);
> -		gem_close(fd, bo);
>  
> -		bo = gem_create(fd, huge_object_size);
> +		bo[1] = gem_create(fd, huge_object_size);
>  		if (tiling_b) {
> -			igt_require(__gem_set_tiling(fd, bo, abs(tiling_b), max_tile_width(devid, tiling_b)) == 0);
> +			igt_require(__gem_set_tiling(fd, bo[1], abs(tiling_b), max_tile_width(devid, tiling_b)) == 0);
>  			valid_size = rounddown(valid_size, tile_row_size(tiling_b, max_tile_width(devid, tiling_b)));
>  		}
> -		b = __gem_mmap__gtt(fd, bo, huge_object_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> +		b = __gem_mmap__gtt(fd, bo[1], huge_object_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
>  		igt_require(b);
> -		gem_close(fd, bo);
>  
> +		gem_set_domain(fd, bo[0], I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
>  		for (i = 0; i < valid_size / PAGE_SIZE; i++) {
>  			uint32_t *ptr = (uint32_t *)(a + PAGE_SIZE*i);
>  			for (int j = 0; j < PAGE_SIZE/4; j++)
> @@ -706,7 +705,7 @@ test_huge_copy(int fd, int huge, int tiling_a, int tiling_b, int ncpus)
>  			igt_progress("Writing a ", i, valid_size / PAGE_SIZE);
>  		}
>  
> -
> +		gem_set_domain(fd, bo[1], I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
>  		for (i = 0; i < valid_size / PAGE_SIZE; i++) {
>  			uint32_t *ptr = (uint32_t *)(b + PAGE_SIZE*i);
>  			for (int j = 0; j < PAGE_SIZE/4; j++)
> @@ -727,12 +726,19 @@ test_huge_copy(int fd, int huge, int tiling_a, int tiling_b, int ncpus)
>  					A_tmp[j] = B_tmp[j];
>  				else
>  					B_tmp[j] = A_tmp[j];
> +
> +			gem_set_domain(fd, bo[0], I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);

why do we repeat this here? I can't see anything that would change the
domains after the first time we set it.

>  			memcpy(A, A_tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +			gem_set_domain(fd, bo[1], I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
>  			memcpy(B, B_tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
>  
>  			igt_progress("Copying a<->b ", i, valid_size / PAGE_SIZE);
>  		}
>  
> +		gem_close(fd, bo[0]);
> +		gem_close(fd, bo[1]);
> +
>  		for (i = 0; i < valid_size / PAGE_SIZE; i++) {
>  			uint32_t page[PAGE_SIZE/sizeof(uint32_t)];
>  			copy_wc_page(page, a + PAGE_SIZE*i);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel