[igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Skip VBlank tests in modules without VBlank (rev3)
Petri Latvala
petri.latvala at intel.com
Thu Feb 7 08:53:33 UTC 2019
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:32:49PM -0200, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> On 01/27, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: Skip VBlank tests in modules without VBlank (rev3)
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48468/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_4791_full -> IGTPW_2301_full
> > ====================================================
> >
> > Summary
> > -------
> >
> > **FAILURE**
> >
> > Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_2301_full absolutely need to be
> > verified manually.
> >
> > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > introduced in IGTPW_2301_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
> > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> >
> > External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/48468/revisions/3/mbox/
> >
> > Possible new issues
> > -------------------
> >
> > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_2301_full:
> >
> > ### IGT changes ###
> >
> > #### Possible regressions ####
> >
> > * igt at gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us:
> > - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> DMESG-WARN
> > - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> DMESG-WARN
> > - shard-glk: NOTRUN -> DMESG-WARN
These are https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109467 I think
> >
> > * igt at gem_mmap_gtt@hang:
> > - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> FAIL
And this is https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109469
> I tried to figure out the reason for the failure described by the CI
> [1]; however, I can’t see any relationship between my patch and the
> problem reported by the CI. I tried to reproduce the CI results on my
> i915, but all the tests passed on my machine.
>
> I suspect this could be a false positive.
Yep, all false positives.
--
Petri Latvala
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list