[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 10/10] tests/psr: Add the same test coverage that we have for PSR1 to PSR2
Dhinakaran Pandiyan
dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com
Wed Jan 16 06:44:19 UTC 2019
On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 17:46 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> The main tests for PSR1 check if hardware tracking is detecting
> changes in planes when modifing it in different ways and now
> those tests will also run for PSR2 if supported by source and sink.
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_psr.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ----
> 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_psr.c b/tests/kms_psr.c
> index 8f2ef89c..b2202cd3 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_psr.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_psr.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ typedef struct {
> int debugfs_fd;
> enum operations op;
> int test_plane_id;
> + enum psr_mode op_psr_mode;
> uint32_t devid;
> uint32_t crtc_id;
> igt_display_t display;
> @@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ typedef struct {
> drmModeModeInfo *mode;
> igt_output_t *output;
> bool with_psr_disabled;
> + bool supports_psr2;
> } data_t;
>
> static void create_cursor_fb(data_t *data)
> @@ -190,10 +192,10 @@ static void fill_render(data_t *data, uint32_t
> handle, unsigned char color)
> gem_bo_busy(data->drm_fd, handle);
> }
>
> -static bool sink_support(data_t *data)
> +static bool sink_support(data_t *data, enum psr_mode mode)
> {
> return data->with_psr_disabled ||
> - psr_sink_support(data->debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1);
> + psr_sink_support(data->debugfs_fd, mode);
> }
>
> static bool psr_wait_entry_if_enabled(data_t *data)
> @@ -201,7 +203,23 @@ static bool psr_wait_entry_if_enabled(data_t
> *data)
> if (data->with_psr_disabled)
> return true;
>
> - return psr_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1);
> + return psr_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode);
> +}
> +
> +static bool psr_wait_update_if_enabled(data_t *data)
> +{
> + if (data->with_psr_disabled)
> + return true;
> +
> + return psr_wait_update(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode);
> +}
> +
> +static bool psr_enable_if_enabled(data_t *data)
This function name is quite confusing. What do you think of using
macros like this
#define PSR_WAIT_ENTRY(data, mode)
return data->with_psr_disabled || psr_wait_entry(data-
>debugfs_fd, mode);
...
> +{
> + if (data->with_psr_disabled)
> + return true;
> +
> + return psr_enable(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode);
> }
>
> static inline void manual(const char *expected)
> @@ -291,7 +309,7 @@ static void run_test(data_t *data)
> expected = "screen GREEN";
> break;
> }
> - igt_assert(psr_wait_update(data->debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1));
> + igt_assert(psr_wait_update_if_enabled(data));
> manual(expected);
> }
>
> @@ -369,6 +387,7 @@ static void setup_test_plane(data_t *data, int
> test_plane)
>
> static void test_setup(data_t *data)
> {
> + psr_enable_if_enabled(data);
> setup_test_plane(data, data->test_plane_id);
> igt_assert(psr_wait_entry_if_enabled(data));
> }
> @@ -399,7 +418,7 @@ static int opt_handler(int opt, int opt_index,
> void *_data)
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> const char *help_str =
> - " --no-psr\tRun test without PSR.";
> + " --no-psr\tRun test without PSR/PSR2.";
> static struct option long_options[] = {
> {"no-psr", 0, 0, 'n'},
> { 0, 0, 0, 0 }
> @@ -417,12 +436,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> kmstest_set_vt_graphics_mode();
> data.devid = intel_get_drm_devid(data.drm_fd);
>
> - if (!data.with_psr_disabled)
> - psr_enable(data.debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1);
> -
> - igt_require_f(sink_support(&data),
> + igt_require_f(sink_support(&data, PSR_MODE_1),
> "Sink does not support PSR\n");
>
> + if (sink_support(&data, PSR_MODE_2)) {
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_2;
> + psr_enable_if_enabled(&data);
There is another enable in test_setup() that the PSR2 subtests call.
Why do we need two?
> + data.supports_psr2 =
> psr_wait_entry_if_enabled(&data);
> + }
> +
> data.bufmgr = drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_init(data.drm_fd,
> 4096);
> igt_assert(data.bufmgr);
> drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_enable_reuse(data.bufmgr);
> @@ -431,12 +453,31 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> }
>
> igt_subtest("basic") {
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_1;
> + data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY;
> + test_setup(&data);
> + test_cleanup(&data);
> + }
Run this in a loop (PSR_MODE_1...PSR_MODE_2) instead of repeating the
same calls?
> +
> + igt_subtest("psr2_basic") {
> + igt_require(data.supports_psr2);
We don't have to generate this subtest if the sink does not support
PSR2. kms_frontbuffer_tracking generates subtests dynamically, we can
use the same approach here.
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_2;
> data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY;
> test_setup(&data);
> test_cleanup(&data);
> }
>
> igt_subtest("no_drrs") {
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_1;
> + data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY;
> + test_setup(&data);
> + igt_assert(drrs_disabled(&data));
> + test_cleanup(&data);
> + }
> +
> + igt_subtest("psr2_no_drrs") {
> + igt_require(data.supports_psr2);
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_2;
> data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY;
> test_setup(&data);
> igt_assert(drrs_disabled(&data));
> @@ -445,6 +486,17 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> for (op = PAGE_FLIP; op <= RENDER; op++) {
> igt_subtest_f("primary_%s", op_str(op)) {
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_1;
> + data.op = op;
> + data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY;
> + test_setup(&data);
> + run_test(&data);
> + test_cleanup(&data);
> + }
> +
> + igt_subtest_f("psr2_primary_%s", op_str(op)) {
> + igt_require(data.supports_psr2);
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_2;
> data.op = op;
> data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY;
> test_setup(&data);
> @@ -455,6 +507,18 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> for (op = MMAP_GTT; op <= PLANE_ONOFF; op++) {
> igt_subtest_f("sprite_%s", op_str(op)) {
> + igt_require(data.supports_psr2);
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_1;
> + data.op = op;
> + data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY;
> + test_setup(&data);
> + run_test(&data);
> + test_cleanup(&data);
> + }
> +
> + igt_subtest_f("psr2_sprite_%s", op_str(op)) {
> + igt_require(data.supports_psr2);
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_2;
> data.op = op;
> data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY;
> test_setup(&data);
> @@ -465,6 +529,17 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> for (op = MMAP_GTT; op <= PLANE_ONOFF; op++) {
> igt_subtest_f("cursor_%s", op_str(op)) {
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_1;
> + data.op = op;
> + data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR;
> + test_setup(&data);
> + run_test(&data);
> + test_cleanup(&data);
> + }
> +
> + igt_subtest_f("psr2_cursor_%s", op_str(op)) {
> + igt_require(data.supports_psr2);
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_2;
> data.op = op;
> data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR;
> test_setup(&data);
> @@ -474,6 +549,18 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> }
>
> igt_subtest_f("dpms") {
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_1;
> + data.op = RENDER;
> + data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY;
> + test_setup(&data);
> + dpms_off_on(&data);
> + run_test(&data);
> + test_cleanup(&data);
> + }
> +
> + igt_subtest_f("psr2_dpms") {
> + igt_require(data.supports_psr2);
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_2;
> data.op = RENDER;
> data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY;
> test_setup(&data);
> @@ -483,6 +570,20 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> }
>
> igt_subtest_f("suspend") {
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_1;
> + data.op = PLANE_ONOFF;
> + data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR;
> + test_setup(&data);
> + igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM,
> + SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
> + igt_assert(psr_wait_entry_if_enabled(&data));
> + run_test(&data);
> + test_cleanup(&data);
> + }
> +
> + igt_subtest_f("psr2_suspend") {
> + igt_require(data.supports_psr2);
> + data.op_psr_mode = PSR_MODE_2;
> data.op = PLANE_ONOFF;
> data.test_plane_id = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR;
> test_setup(&data);
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list