[igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for tests: Add variable refresh rate tests (rev4)
Petri Latvala
petri.latvala at intel.com
Tue Jan 29 09:51:20 UTC 2019
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:32:37PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: tests: Add variable refresh rate tests (rev4)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/54960/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5494_full -> IGTPW_2309_full
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_2309_full absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in IGTPW_2309_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
> External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/54960/revisions/4/mbox/
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_2309_full:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt at kms_busy@basic-modeset-a:
> - shard-apl: PASS -> FAIL +2
> - shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL +3
> - shard-snb: PASS -> FAIL +2
>
> * igt at kms_busy@basic-modeset-b:
> - shard-kbl: PASS -> FAIL +3
>
> * igt at kms_busy@basic-modeset-c:
> - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> FAIL
>
> * igt at kms_vblank@crtc-id:
> - shard-hsw: PASS -> FAIL +3
>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 04:00:47PM +0000, Wentland, Harry wrote:
> I'll merge it if it passes Intel's CI.
This got merged after BAT passed, but before the full round was
run. For the record, Fi.CI.BAT is the basic test round that determines
if the patch set is obviously broken, and Fi.CI.IGT is the real thing
with most IGT tests run.
The failures are filed as
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109490 and follow the
pattern of
(kms_busy:1080) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function flip_to_fb, file ../tests/kms_busy.c:125:
(kms_busy:1080) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: nanosleep(&tv, NULL) == -1
(kms_busy:1080) CRITICAL: flip to fb[0] blocked waiting for busy fb
I did some quick testing and the value of the property is already 0
when we try to set it. Didn't investigate further.
What do you suggest as the plan forward?
1)
if (igt_pipe_obj_has_prop(pipe, IGT_CRTC_VRR_ENABLED) &&
igt_pipe_obj_get_prop(pipe, IGT_CRTC_VRR_ENABLED))
igt_pipe_obj_set_prop_value(pipe, IGT_CRTC_VRR_ENABLED, 0);
2)
"It's a kernel bug, lemme fix that real quick"
3)
"It's a bug in kms_busy.c, lemme fix that real quick"
4)
Revert and do further debugging
--
Petri Latvala
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list