[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_eio: 64 batches may be too many for some devices!
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Jan 30 13:12:12 UTC 2019
Actually measure how many batches we can fit into a ring before
blocking, or else we may end up hanging the device earlier than
expected!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
---
tests/i915/gem_eio.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_eio.c b/tests/i915/gem_eio.c
index 09059c311..534bd1899 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_eio.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_eio.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include "igt_device.h"
#include "igt_sysfs.h"
#include "sw_sync.h"
+#include "i915/gem_ring.h"
IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test that specific ioctls report a wedged GPU (EIO).");
@@ -358,10 +359,15 @@ static void test_inflight(int fd, unsigned int wait)
{
int parent_fd = fd;
unsigned int engine;
+ int max;
igt_require_gem(fd);
igt_require(gem_has_exec_fence(fd));
+ max = gem_measure_ring_inflight(fd, -1, 0);
+ igt_require(max > 1);
+ max = min(max - 1, 64);
+
for_each_engine(parent_fd, engine) {
const uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj[2];
@@ -389,7 +395,7 @@ static void test_inflight(int fd, unsigned int wait)
execbuf.buffer_count = 2;
execbuf.flags = engine | I915_EXEC_FENCE_OUT;
- for (unsigned int n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(fence); n++) {
+ for (unsigned int n = 0; n < max; n++) {
gem_execbuf_wr(fd, &execbuf);
fence[n] = execbuf.rsvd2 >> 32;
igt_assert(fence[n] != -1);
@@ -397,7 +403,7 @@ static void test_inflight(int fd, unsigned int wait)
check_wait(fd, obj[1].handle, wait);
- for (unsigned int n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(fence); n++) {
+ for (unsigned int n = 0; n < max; n++) {
igt_assert_eq(sync_fence_status(fence[n]), -EIO);
close(fence[n]);
}
@@ -418,6 +424,11 @@ static void test_inflight_suspend(int fd)
uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
int fence[64]; /* conservative estimate of ring size */
igt_spin_t *hang;
+ int max;
+
+ max = gem_measure_ring_inflight(fd, -1, 0);
+ igt_require(max > 1);
+ max = min(max - 1, 64);
fd = gem_reopen_driver(fd);
igt_require_gem(fd);
@@ -437,7 +448,7 @@ static void test_inflight_suspend(int fd)
execbuf.buffer_count = 2;
execbuf.flags = I915_EXEC_FENCE_OUT;
- for (unsigned int n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(fence); n++) {
+ for (unsigned int n = 0; n < max; n++) {
gem_execbuf_wr(fd, &execbuf);
fence[n] = execbuf.rsvd2 >> 32;
igt_assert(fence[n] != -1);
@@ -448,7 +459,7 @@ static void test_inflight_suspend(int fd)
check_wait(fd, obj[1].handle, 10);
- for (unsigned int n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(fence); n++) {
+ for (unsigned int n = 0; n < max; n++) {
igt_assert_eq(sync_fence_status(fence[n]), -EIO);
close(fence[n]);
}
--
2.20.1
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list