[igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2] tests/kms_ccs: Skip with a more meaningful message

[Arkadiusz Hiler]

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:33:48PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: series starting with [i-g-t,1/2] tests/kms_ccs: Skip with a more meaningful message
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/63226/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6413 -> IGTPW_3242
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_3242 absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in IGTPW_3242, please notify your bug team to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/63226/revisions/1/mbox/
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_3242:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at i915_selftest@live_hangcheck:
>     - fi-kbl-guc:         [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6413/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3242/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html

There were expected new failures due to some logging changes but in
kms_ccs so definately not any of the selftests :-)

Martin, can you file this bug and re-report? Thanks in advance!

-- 
Cheers,
Arek