[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] Dockerfile.fedora: Download peg source from our own mirror

[Lyude Paul]

On Fri, 2019-07-05 at 11:08 +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:52:03AM +0300, Ser, Simon wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-07-05 at 10:32 +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> > > The original URL used http + seems to be author's own small site and is
> > > currently down.
> > > 
> > > Instead of waiting for it to be up again just to hammer it with our CI
> > > we can set up our own mirror for the tarball and use it.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Simon Ser <simon.ser at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
> > 
> > Yeah, I've seen this too and wondered what the best solution would be.
> > 
> > It would be very nice to convince Fedora to package this software.
> > Maybe it wouldn't be too hard since we already have a proper igt
> > package there?
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/intel-gpu-tools/overview/
> > 
> > In the meantime:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Ser <simon.ser at intel.com>
> 
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/igt-ci-tags/pipelines/46817
> 
> And merged. Thanks!
> 
> Ccing Ajax and Lyude, as they may be able to tell us how and if it is
> possible to get peg packaged in Fedora.
> 
> Debian package for reference: https://packages.debian.org/sid/peg
> 
> Also, I have noticed that IGT is still using the old name
> (intel-gpu-tools) in Fedora.
> 
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/intel-gpu-tools

Not anymore! This was the case for a while and the package entry is still there,
but running `dnf install intel-gpu-tools` will now redirect you to the newer
igt-gpu-tools package which I've been trying to keep fairly up to date, and
anyone with the older intel-gpu-tools package will get it replaced with the
newer one once they update their system. However, you did just make me notice
that it still doesn't seem to appear on

https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/igt-gpu-tools

for some weird reason. I just opened a bug for this so hopefully it will get
fixed soon:

https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7974

As for peg, I'd probably be fine with maintaining it and getting it into Fedora.
It doesn't seem to be a very complicated package anyhow. Or if someone wants to
get it done more quickly and write up a .spec file for it, I'll be happy to
review! See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines

>