[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] perf_pmu: Actually require engines again
Petri Latvala
petri.latvala at intel.com
Tue Jun 4 08:46:12 UTC 2019
In commit 32e421f6f74a ("test: perf_pmu: use the gem_engine_topology
library") perf_pmu was converted to use gem_context_has_engine()
instead of gem_require_engine, but missing the crucial part of
igt_require().
Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at intel.com>
---
tests/perf_pmu.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index 72b9166a..fdaf96da 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -1714,7 +1714,7 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest_group {
igt_fixture {
- gem_context_has_engine(fd, 0, e->flags);
+ igt_require(gem_context_has_engine(fd, 0, e->flags));
}
/**
@@ -1903,8 +1903,8 @@ igt_main
__for_each_physical_engine(render_fd, e) {
igt_subtest_group {
igt_fixture {
- gem_context_has_engine(render_fd,
- 0, e->flags);
+ igt_require(gem_context_has_engine(render_fd,
+ 0, e->flags));
}
igt_subtest_f("render-node-busy-%s", e->name)
--
2.19.1
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list