[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 4/5] CONTRIBUTING: Rework a bit and update
Arkadiusz Hiler
arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com
Thu Jun 27 12:57:49 UTC 2019
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 04:49:39PM +0300, Ser, Simon wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 13:54 +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> > I have split the main body of the CONTRIBUTING file to 3 sections:
> > * the short welcome message
> > * the code - styling, suggestions
> > * sending patches - licensing informations, mailing lists, reviews, etc.
> >
> > Changes for the code section contents:
> > * link to the kernel coding style docs
> > * be more clear on subtest naming
> > * mention igt_describe()
> >
> > Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
>
> Should that be a S-o-b instead?
oops
> > ---
> > CONTRIBUTING.md | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md
> > index d3a3d099..7deba078 100644
> > --- a/CONTRIBUTING.md
> > +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md
> > @@ -1,9 +1,41 @@
> > +CONTRIBUTING
> > +============
> > +
> > Patches to igt-gpu-tools are very much welcome, we really want this to be the
> > universal set of low-level tools and testcases for kernel graphics drivers
> > on Linux and similar platforms. So please bring on porting patches, bugfixes,
> > improvements for documentation and new tools and testcases.
> >
> > -A short list of contribution guidelines:
> > +
> > +The Code
> > +--------
> > +
> > +- The code should follow kernel coding style:
> > + https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html
> > +
> > +- Testcases (subtests) have to use minus signs (-) as a word separator.
> > + The generated documentation contains glossary of commonly used terms.
>
> Do we have a link to this generated documentation somewhere?
>
> > +- All new test have to be described using `igt_describe()` family of
> > + functions. The description should contain the spirit of the test (what is
> > + the general idea behind the test) and *not* the letter (C to English
> > + translation of the test). Refer to `igt_describe()` documentation for more
> > + details.
>
> Again, a direct link would be nice.
I'll put it near the top of README. Is that enough or do you still see
some value in having it also linked here?
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list