[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_nop: Drop signal-all subtest from CI

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Ashutosh Dixit (2019-03-06 04:55:32)
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 20:45:09 -0800, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> > 
> > igt at gem-exec-nop@signal-all runs a single uninterrupted loop for 150
> > sec. This results in the test being one of the longest execution times
> > in CI runs.
> > 
> > According to mailing list discussions the test provides little of
> > value. Therefore drop it from the CI.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > index f3440f31..a2101ae7 100644
> > --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ igt at gem_exec_flush@(?!.*basic).*
> >  igt at gem_exec_gttfill@(?!.*basic).*
> >  igt at gem_exec_latency(@.*)?
> >  igt at gem_exec_lut_handle(@.*)?
> > -igt at gem_exec_nop@(?!.*(basic|signal-all)).*
> > +igt at gem_exec_nop@(?!.*basic).*
> >  igt at gem_exec_reloc@(?!.*basic).*
> >  igt at gem_exec_suspend@(?!.*basic).*
> >  igt at gem_exec_whisper@(?!normal$).*
> 
> I had submitted this patch last week. Just wanted to check if there was any
> interest in the patch at all, that is in removing
> igt at gem-exec-nop@signal-all from the CI. Thanks!

And pushed, thank you.
-Chris