[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/i915: Bump conservative threshold for ring size
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Mon Oct 7 16:56:20 UTC 2019
On 07/10/2019 09:27, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We are still hitting the occasional stall upon submission, so be extra
> caution and leave one more spare.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> lib/i915/gem_ring.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/i915/gem_ring.c b/lib/i915/gem_ring.c
> index 272264659..9f099edff 100644
> --- a/lib/i915/gem_ring.c
> +++ b/lib/i915/gem_ring.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ __gem_measure_ring_inflight(int fd, unsigned int engine, enum measure_ring_flags
> } while (1);
>
> igt_assert_eq(__execbuf(fd, &execbuf), -EINTR);
> - igt_assert(count > 1);
> + igt_assert(count > 2);
>
> memset(&itv, 0, sizeof(itv));
> setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &itv, NULL);
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ __gem_measure_ring_inflight(int fd, unsigned int engine, enum measure_ring_flags
> gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
>
> /* Be conservative in case we must wrap later */
> - return count - 1;
> + return count - 2;
> }
>
> /**
>
Will one make a difference?
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list