[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/i915: Use explicit iterator names in for_each_engine()
Andi Shyti
andi.shyti at intel.com
Sat Oct 26 17:39:23 UTC 2019
Hi Chris,
I thought we wanted to keep the warnings as a reminder until we
removed the legacy foreach :)
[...]
> diff --git a/lib/igt_gt.h b/lib/igt_gt.h
> index 73b5002a0..66088d391 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_gt.h
> +++ b/lib/igt_gt.h
> @@ -72,19 +72,21 @@ extern const struct intel_execution_engine {
> unsigned flags;
> } intel_execution_engines[];
>
> +#define eb_ring(e) ((e)->exec_id | (e)->flags)
> +
> #define for_if(expr__) if (!(expr__)) {} else
>
> -#define for_each_engine(fd__, flags__) \
> - for (const struct intel_execution_engine *e__ = intel_execution_engines;\
> - e__->name; \
> - e__++) \
> - for_if (gem_has_ring(fd__, flags__ = e__->exec_id | e__->flags))
> -
> -#define for_each_physical_engine(fd__, flags__) \
> - for (const struct intel_execution_engine *e__ = intel_execution_engines;\
> - e__->name; \
> - e__++) \
> - for_if (gem_ring_has_physical_engine(fd__, flags__ = e__->exec_id | e__->flags))
> +#define for_each_engine(it__, fd__) \
> + for (const struct intel_execution_engine *it__ = intel_execution_engines;\
> + it__->name; \
> + it__++) \
> + for_if (gem_has_ring(fd__, eb_ring(it__)))
> +
> +#define for_each_physical_engine(it__, fd__) \
> + for (const struct intel_execution_engine *it__ = intel_execution_engines;\
> + it__->name; \
> + it__++) \
> + for_if (gem_ring_has_physical_engine(fd__, eb_ring(it__)))
(we already talked once about this) it makes more sense to me the
iterator to be declared outside the from loop in order to not keep
it hidden from the user.
It's also to be consistent with all the rest of the iterations,
starting from the 'for()'.
Nevertheless, I think this code is going to disappear somedays,
so that:
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at intel.com>
Thanks,
Andi
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list