[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Add signal sender name when dying
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Sep 18 10:49:57 UTC 2019
Quoting Petri Latvala (2019-09-18 11:45:33)
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:35:18AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > We want to know who sent us the fatal signal, for there are plenty of
> > fingers to go around.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
> > ---
> > runner/executor.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/runner/executor.c b/runner/executor.c
> > index c1cfcce83..f7183293d 100644
> > --- a/runner/executor.c
> > +++ b/runner/executor.c
> > @@ -609,6 +609,26 @@ static bool kill_child(int sig, pid_t child)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +static const char *get_cmdline(pid_t pid, char *buf, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + int fd;
> > +
> > + if (snprintf(buf, len, "/proc/%d/cmdline", pid) > len)
> > + return "unknown";
> > +
> > + fd = open(buf, O_RDONLY);
> > + if (fd < 0)
> > + return "unknown";
> > +
> > + len = read(fd, buf, len - 1);
> > + close(fd);
> > + if (len < 0)
> > + return "unknown";
> > +
> > + buf[len] = '\0';
> > + return buf;
> > +}
>
> Are you intentionally only printing argv[0]? argv items are
> \0-separated in /proc/*/cmdline.
Yes, we only want a human friendly process name, or do we need the full
cmdline because it's java??? If it's java, I'm running away.
-Chris
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list