[igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for DC states igt tests patch series (rev21)
Gupta, Anshuman
anshuman.gupta at intel.com
Fri Sep 20 10:13:44 UTC 2019
On 9/20/2019 3:34 PM, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 05:46:32AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
>> == Series Details ==
>>
>> Series: DC states igt tests patch series (rev21)
>> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/56713/
>> State : success
>>
>> == Summary ==
>>
>> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6923_full -> IGTPW_3480_full
>> ====================================================
>>
>> Summary
>> -------
>>
>> **SUCCESS**
>>
>> No regressions found.
>>
>> External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/56713/revisions/21/mbox/
>>
>> Possible new issues
>> -------------------
>>
>> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_3480_full:
>>
>> ### IGT changes ###
>>
>> #### Possible regressions ####
>>
>> * {igt at i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms} (NEW):
>> - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1]
>> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3480/shard-iclb3/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms.html
>> - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][2]
>> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3480/shard-kbl1/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms.html
>
>
> The series looks otherwise good to go, but these two fails need an ack
> from Martin/Lakshmi first for filing bugs and cibuglog filters for
> them.
Hi Petri ,
These failures due to the reason few platform are not able to go to PC8
state.
There is already a bug raised for these failures,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110548
I have put my analysis there (PCIe express devices blocking it).
Thanks ,
Anshuman Gupta.
>
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list