[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/6] tests/kms_vblank: Make sure that we have a mode set
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Mon Apr 6 09:11:35 UTC 2020
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 04:03:01PM +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> Subtest 'invalid' was depending on a "leftover" mode set by something
> external (usually fbcon) in order to work.
>
> Let's make the test more robust by setting the mode explicitly.
>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_vblank.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_vblank.c b/tests/kms_vblank.c
> index a895ab80..edf8581e 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_vblank.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_vblank.c
> @@ -472,9 +472,22 @@ static void invalid_subtest(data_t *data, int fd)
> {
> union drm_wait_vblank vbl;
> unsigned long valid_flags;
> + enum pipe pipe;
> + igt_output_t* output;
> + bool found = false;
>
> igt_display_require_output_on_pipe(&data->display, 0);
Is the above needed still?
>
> + /* we need to have a mode set, otherwise we will get EINVAL no matter what */
> + for_each_pipe_with_single_output(&data->display, pipe, output) {
> + data->pipe = pipe;
> + found = true;
> + break;
> + }
So far pipe A was assumed. I guess it's better to make it more flexible,
but then you have to add kmstest_get_vbl_flag() to the request flags
too.
> +
> + igt_require_f(found, "No outputs connected = no vblanks\n");
> + prepare_crtc(data, fd, output);
> +
> /* First check all is well with a simple query */
> memset(&vbl, 0, sizeof(vbl));
> vbl.request.type = DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE;
> @@ -508,6 +521,7 @@ static void invalid_subtest(data_t *data, int fd)
> vbl.request.type |= _DRM_VBLANK_SECONDARY;
> vbl.request.type |= _DRM_VBLANK_FLAGS_MASK;
> igt_assert_eq(wait_vblank(fd, &vbl), -EINVAL);
> + cleanup_crtc(data, fd, output);
> }
>
> igt_main
> --
> 2.24.1
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list