[igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for lib: Fix device lists not cleaned up sufficiently before rescan (rev2)

[Arkadiusz Hiler]

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 07:25:57PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: lib: Fix device lists not cleaned up sufficiently before rescan (rev2)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/74929/
> State : failure
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_4401_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at gem_eio@reset-stress:
>     - shard-tglb:         [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5561/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_eio@reset-stress.html
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_4401/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_eio@reset-stress.html
> 
>   * igt at gem_mmap_gtt@hang:
>     - shard-iclb:         [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4]
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5561/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@hang.html
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_4401/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@hang.html
> 
>   * igt at gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded:
>     - shard-apl:          [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6]
>    [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5561/shard-apl8/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html
>    [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_4401/shard-apl7/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html
>     - shard-glk:          [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8]
>    [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5561/shard-glk9/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html
>    [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_4401/shard-glk9/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html
>     - shard-kbl:          [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10]
>    [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5561/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html
>    [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_4401/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html

A bunch of unrelated GEM failures.

Other than that the results look clean, so I have merged the patch.
Thanks!

-- 
Cheers,
Arek