[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: More task debug!
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Apr 16 10:10:25 UTC 2020
Quoting Petri Latvala (2020-04-16 10:48:05)
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:39:18AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > In a few cases, we hit a timeout where no process appears to be
> > deadlocked (i.e. tasks stuck in 'D' with intertwined stacks) but
> > everything appears to be running happily. Often, they appear to be
> > fighting over the shrinker, so one naturally presumes we are running low
> > on memory. But for tests that were designed to run with ample memory to
> > spare, that is a little disconcerting and I would like to know where the
> > memory actually went.
> >
> > sysrq('m'): Will dump current memory info to your console
> >
> > Sounds like that should do the trick.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
>
> If indeed 'm' does what you want and not just useless crud like first
> two lines of /proc/meminfo,
It calls into show_mem(), the same as used for oom and panics. Sounds
promising. /Fortunately/ we have some timeouts so we will get to see
what happens in practice.
-Chris
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list