[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_ctx_bad_destroy: Added test description for test case

[priyanka.dandamudi at intel.com]

From: Priyanka Dandamudi <priyanka.dandamudi at intel.com>

Added test description for all the available subtests.

Cc: Melkaveri, Arjun <Arjun.Melkaveri at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Dandamudi <priyanka.dandamudi at intel.com>
---
 tests/i915/gem_ctx_bad_destroy.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_bad_destroy.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_bad_destroy.c
index 50bb9aa0..2ebc5abb 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_bad_destroy.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_bad_destroy.c
@@ -53,18 +53,24 @@ igt_main
 	}
 
 	/* try double destroy */
+	igt_describe("Test tries to destroy context two times "
+		     "and checks if second destroy returns (ENOENT)error on no entry or not.");
 	igt_subtest("double-destroy") {
 		ctx_id = gem_context_create(fd);
 		gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx_id);
 		igt_assert(__gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx_id) == -ENOENT);
 	}
-
+	
+	igt_describe("Test checks if invalid destroy of contextid returns ENOENT or not.");
 	igt_subtest("invalid-ctx")
 		igt_assert(__gem_context_destroy(fd, 2) == -ENOENT);
-
+	
+	igt_describe("Test checks if destroy of default context returns ENOENT or not.");
 	igt_subtest("invalid-default-ctx")
 		igt_assert(__gem_context_destroy(fd, 0) == -ENOENT);
-
+	
+	igt_describe("Test checks if invalid pad value is given "
+		     "while destroying context returns error or not(EINVAL).");
 	igt_subtest("invalid-pad") {
 		struct drm_i915_gem_context_destroy destroy;
 
-- 
2.28.0