[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] intel-ci: Include the small concurrent tests

[Petri Latvala]

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 09:38:57AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Petri Latvala (2020-12-14 06:47:10)
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:32:58PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > The tiny tests run quick, but sometimes just enough to trip over the
> > > system.
> > > 
> > > v2: Only 4K, and only the bigger bombs.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > index c6af22b30..db8480c93 100644
> > > --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ igt at i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress-extra-wait
> > >  ###############################################
> > >  igt at gem_busy@hang.*
> > >  igt at gem_close_race@(?!.*basic).*
> > > -igt at gem_concurrent_blit(@.*)?
> > > +igt at gem_concurrent_blit@(?!4KiB-tiny.*bomb)
> > 
> > ITYM igt at gem_concurrent_blit@(?!4kib-tiny.*bomb)
> 
> The name I gave the test is 4KiB. Why would something be renaming them?
> [Yes, I think it is absurd that the results have different names from
> the tests.]

piglit is the one that originally did that. igt_runner tries to be
compatible.


-- 
Petri Latvala