[igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/perf_pmu: Exercise I915_PMU_SOFTWARE_GT_AWAKE_TIME
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Dec 17 17:45:06 UTC 2020
On 17/12/2020 17:39, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-12-17 17:33:05)
>>
>> On 17/12/2020 17:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> Measure the sample gt-awake time while each engine and every engine is
>>> busy. They should all report the same duration, the elapsed runtime of
>>> the batch.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h | 3 ++-
>>> tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h b/include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h
>>> index ef696d1a5..bf9ea471c 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h
>>> @@ -177,8 +177,9 @@ enum drm_i915_pmu_engine_sample {
>>> #define I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY __I915_PMU_OTHER(1)
>>> #define I915_PMU_INTERRUPTS __I915_PMU_OTHER(2)
>>> #define I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY __I915_PMU_OTHER(3)
>>> +#define I915_PMU_SOFTWARE_GT_AWAKE_TIME __I915_PMU_OTHER(4)
>>>
>>> -#define I915_PMU_LAST I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY
>>> +#define I915_PMU_LAST /* Deprecated - do not use */ I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY
>>>
>>> /* Each region is a minimum of 16k, and there are at most 255 of them.
>>> */
>>> diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
>>> index c2b186d39..90182074b 100644
>>> --- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
>>> +++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
>>> @@ -883,6 +883,42 @@ sema_busy(int gem_fd,
>>> close(fd[1]);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void test_awake(int i915)
>>> +{
>>> + const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
>>> + unsigned long slept;
>>> + uint64_t val;
>>> + int fd;
>>> +
>>> + fd = perf_i915_open(i915, I915_PMU_SOFTWARE_GT_AWAKE_TIME);
>>> + igt_skip_on(fd < 0);
>>> +
>>> + /* Check that each engine is captured by the GT wakeref */
>>> + __for_each_physical_engine(i915, e) {
>>> + igt_spin_new(i915, .engine = e->flags);
>>> +
>>> + val = pmu_read_single(fd);
>>> + slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
>>> + val = pmu_read_single(fd) - val;
>>> +
>>> + gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
>>> + assert_within_epsilon(val, slept, tolerance);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* And that the total GT wakeref matches walltime not summation */
>>> + __for_each_physical_engine(i915, e)
>>> + igt_spin_new(i915, .engine = e->flags);
>>> +
>>> + val = pmu_read_single(fd);
>>> + slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
>>> + val = pmu_read_single(fd) - val;
>>> +
>>> + gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
>>> + assert_within_epsilon(val, slept, tolerance);
>>> +
>>
>> Erm who terminates all those spinners? :)
>
> gem_quiescent_gpu() calls igt_terminate_spins(). Hmm, I actually thought
> it freed them too, but what's a small leak...
Okay, I'm fine with that.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list