[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_rpm: mmap type based dynamic subtests

[C, Ramalingam]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 1:16 PM
> To: C, Ramalingam <ramalingam.c at intel.com>; igt-dev <igt-
> dev at lists.freedesktop.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_rpm: mmap type based dynamic
> subtests
> 
> Quoting Ramalingam C (2020-02-17 09:44:42)
> > On 2020-02-17 at 15:10:45 +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> > > Tests for gem_mmap_gtt/cpu are replaced with dynamic subtests with
> > > the array of mmap_types passed to gem_mmap_offset.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com>
> > > cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c
> > > index 3d7343240802..0c2821122956 100644
> > > --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c
> > > +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c
> > > @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static void
> debugfs_forcewake_user_subtest(void)
> > >       igt_assert(wait_for_suspended());  }
> > >
> > > -static void gem_mmap_subtest(bool gtt_mmap)
> > > +static void gem_mmap_args(const struct mmap_offset *t)
> > >  {
> > >       int i;
> > >       uint32_t handle;
> > > @@ -1019,14 +1019,9 @@ static void gem_mmap_subtest(bool
> gtt_mmap)
> > >
> > >       handle = gem_create(drm_fd, buf_size);
> > >
> > > -     if (gtt_mmap) {
> > > -             gem_buf = gem_mmap__gtt(drm_fd, handle, buf_size,
> > > -                                     PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> > > -     }
> > > -     else {
> > > -             gem_buf = gem_mmap__cpu(drm_fd, handle, 0, buf_size, 0);
> > > -     }
> > > -
> > > +     gem_buf = __gem_mmap_offset(drm_fd, handle, 0, buf_size,
> > > +                                 PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, t->type);
> > > +     igt_require(gem_buf);
> > >
> > >       for (i = 0; i < buf_size; i++)
> > >               gem_buf[i] = i & 0xFF; @@ -1056,13 +1051,9 @@ static
> > > void gem_mmap_subtest(bool gtt_mmap)
> > >        * suspended. */
> > >       disable_all_screens_and_wait(&ms_data);
> > >
> > > -     if (gtt_mmap) {
> > > -             gem_buf = gem_mmap__gtt(drm_fd, handle, buf_size,
> > > -                                     PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> > > -     }
> > > -     else {
> > > -             gem_buf = gem_mmap__cpu(drm_fd, handle, 0, buf_size, 0);
> > > -     }
> > > +     gem_buf = __gem_mmap_offset(drm_fd, handle, 0, buf_size,
> > > +                                 PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, t->type);
> > > +     igt_require(gem_buf);
> > >
> > >       igt_assert(wait_for_suspended());
> > >
> > > @@ -2014,10 +2005,13 @@ igt_main_args("", long_options, help_str,
> opt_handler, NULL)
> > >               modeset_subtest(SCREEN_TYPE_NON_LPSP, 1, WAIT_STATUS |
> > > USE_DPMS);
> > >
> > >       /* GEM */
> > > -     igt_subtest("gem-mmap-cpu")
> > > -             gem_mmap_subtest(false);
> > > -     igt_subtest("gem-mmap-gtt")
> > > -             gem_mmap_subtest(true);
> > > +     igt_subtest_with_dynamic("gem-mmap-type") {
> > > +             for_each_mmap_offset_type(t) {
> > > +                     igt_dynamic_f("%s", t->name)
> > > +                             gem_mmap_args(t);
> > > +             }
> > > +     }
> > Chris,
> >
> > This is what you suggested I guess. But what is the mmap_offset is not
> > supported? shouldn't we have the legacy tests in such scenario?
> 
> mmap-offset is a pure extension of mmap-gtt.
> 
> There's no point testing the plain mmap_ioctl in this test as that does not
> use i915 for fault handling; it is independent of our rpm.

Chris,

So I interpret this as no need for mmap_gtt in case of mmap_offset missing.
In that case do you think this patch is good to merge.?

As we discussed I will include the lmem coverage as a separate patch.

-Ram.

> -Chris