[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/gem_lut_handle: Minor fixes
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Feb 26 12:48:04 UTC 2020
Quoting bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com (2020-02-26 05:46:34)
> From: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>
>
> Remove redundent logics.
> After exec, destroy BO properly.
> Remove unnecessary & unused macros.
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_lut_handle.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_lut_handle.c b/tests/i915/gem_lut_handle.c
> index fec65dd8..367d8bdf 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_lut_handle.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_lut_handle.c
> @@ -41,10 +41,6 @@
> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Exercises the basic execbuffer using the handle LUT"
> " interface.");
>
> -#define BATCH_SIZE (1024*1024)
> -
> -#define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT (1<<12)
> -
> #define NORMAL 0
> #define USE_LUT 0x1
> #define BROKEN 0x2
> @@ -80,7 +76,7 @@ static int exec(int fd, uint32_t handle, unsigned int flags)
> execbuf.num_cliprects = 0;
> execbuf.DR1 = 0;
> execbuf.DR4 = 0;
> - execbuf.flags = flags & USE_LUT ? LOCAL_I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT : 0;
> + execbuf.flags = flags & USE_LUT ? I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT : 0;
> i915_execbuffer2_set_context_id(execbuf, 0);
> execbuf.rsvd2 = 0;
>
> @@ -147,7 +143,7 @@ static int many_exec(int fd, uint32_t batch, int num_exec, int num_reloc, unsign
> execbuf.num_cliprects = 0;
> execbuf.DR1 = 0;
> execbuf.DR4 = 0;
> - execbuf.flags = flags & USE_LUT ? LOCAL_I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT : 0;
> + execbuf.flags = flags & USE_LUT ? I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT : 0;
> i915_execbuffer2_set_context_id(execbuf, 0);
> execbuf.rsvd2 = 0;
>
> @@ -180,8 +176,6 @@ igt_simple_main
> fail(exec(fd, handle, BROKEN));
>
> igt_skip_on(exec(fd, handle, USE_LUT));
> -
> - do_or_die(exec(fd, handle, USE_LUT));
You never know, might be significant. And no harm so I'd leave and just
do a simple patch that removes the LOCAL define.
> fail(exec(fd, handle, USE_LUT | BROKEN));
>
> for (i = 2; i <= SLOW_QUICK(65536, 8); i *= 2) {
> @@ -228,4 +222,6 @@ igt_simple_main
> fail(many_exec(fd, handle, i+1, i, USE_LUT | BROKEN));
> fail(many_exec(fd, handle, i+1, i+1, USE_LUT | BROKEN));
> }
> +
> + gem_close(fd, handle);
But we don't close the fd either. The point of the exercise was to leave
it all for process termination.
-Chris
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list