[igt-dev] [RFC i-g-t] LPSP igt test on TGL
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Feb 27 12:55:48 UTC 2020
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 02:11:49PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | |
> | |
> | |
> | +--------------------+ +-------------+ +------------+ |
> | | | | | | | |
> | | PIPE A | | DP/HDMI | | PORT_A | |
> | | +--------+ TRANSCODER +---------+ | |
> | | | | | | | |
> | +--------------------+ +-------------> +------------> |
> | | | | | |
> | | | | PORT_B | |
> | | | | | |
> | | | | | |
> | +-------------> +------------> |
> | | | | | |
> | | DSI | | PORT_C | |
> | | TRANSCODER | | | |
> | +-------------> +------------+ |
> | | | |
> | | | |
> | | | |
> | | | |
> | | | |
> | | | |
> | | | |
> | +-------------+ |
> | |
> | LPSP on Tigerlake |
> | |
> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> Above block diagram depicts lpsp on TGL, while earlier development of lpsp igt test
> it has been assumed that every non-edp panel is not a lpsp panel but it is not true
> on TGL,
It wasn't necessarily true on earlier platforms either. I don't know if
this makes any sense whatsoever. Probably a better way to validate would
be to check that the resulting power domains make sense for various
single pipe configurations.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list