[igt-dev] [PATCH] i915/gem_exec_params: add test_invalid_batch_start
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Wed Mar 4 20:52:43 UTC 2020
Sanity check that kernel rejects too large batch_start_offset.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c
index cf7ea306..afc8d2c7 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c
@@ -268,6 +268,23 @@ static void mmapped(int i915)
gem_close(i915, buf);
}
+static void test_invalid_batch_start(int fd)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 exec = {
+ .handle = batch_create(fd),
+ };
+ struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf = {
+ .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&exec),
+ .buffer_count = 1,
+ .batch_start_offset = 4096, /* space jump */
+ };
+
+ igt_assert_eq(__gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf), -EINVAL);
+
+ gem_sync(fd, exec.handle);
+ gem_close(fd, exec.handle);
+}
+
struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf;
struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 gem_exec[1];
uint32_t batch[2] = {MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END};
@@ -507,6 +524,9 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("batch-first")
test_batch_first(fd);
+ igt_subtest("invalid-batch-start-offset")
+ test_invalid_batch_start(fd);
+
#define DIRT(name) \
igt_subtest(#name "-dirt") { \
execbuf.flags = 0; \
--
2.20.1
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list