[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/i915: Split igt_require_gem() into i915/
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu May 7 09:45:19 UTC 2020
Quoting Petri Latvala (2020-05-07 10:40:35)
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:45:50AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > +void igt_require_gem(int i915)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + igt_require_intel(i915);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We only want to use the throttle-ioctl for its -EIO reporting
> > + * of a wedged device, not for actually waiting on outstanding
> > + * requests! So create a new drm_file for the device that is clean.
> > + */
> > + i915 = gem_reopen_driver(i915);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Reset the global seqno at the start of each test. This ensures that
> > + * the test will not wrap unless it explicitly sets up seqno wrapping
> > + * itself, which avoids accidentally hanging when setting up long
> > + * sequences of batches.
> > + */
> > + reset_device(i915);
> > +
> > + err = 0;
> > + if (ioctl(i915, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_THROTTLE)) {
> > + err = -errno;
> > + igt_assume(err);
> > + }
> > +
> > + close(i915);
> > +
> > + igt_require_f(err == 0, "Unresponsive i915/GEM device\n");
>
>
> Food for thought (not for this patch): Using igt_abort_f() for this instead?
Not everything requires gem? But yeah, it's pretty common to have a pile
of skips after toasting the GPU.
> <snip>
>
> > diff --git a/lib/igt_debugfs.c b/lib/igt_debugfs.c
> > index 9e6c5c993..050670785 100644
> > --- a/lib/igt_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/lib/igt_debugfs.c
> > @@ -1110,13 +1110,10 @@ static int get_object_count(int fd)
> > */
> > int igt_get_stable_obj_count(int driver)
> > {
> > - int obj_count;
> > - gem_quiescent_gpu(driver);
> > - obj_count = get_object_count(driver);
> > /* The test relies on the system being in the same state before and
> > * after the test so any difference in the object count is a result of
> > * leaks during the test. */
> > - return obj_count;
> > + return get_object_count(driver);
> > }
>
> No more quiescenting here?
gem_object_count() already was idling and freeing.
> <snip>
>
>
> > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c
> > index 3d52987d1..bd3c819b4 100644
> > --- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c
> > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> > #include <unistd.h>
> >
> > #include "drmtest.h" /* gem_quiescent_gpu()! */
>
> This comment appears on multiple tests and is now lying.
Good point, I can stop ranting in a few places :)
-Chris
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list