[igt-dev] [i-g-t, v9, 28/29] tests/api_intel_bb: Remove check-canonical test
Melkaveri, Arjun
arjun.melkaveri at intel.com
Tue Nov 17 19:49:12 UTC 2020
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 09:52:09AM +0100, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> As intel-bb uses internally decanonical address for objects/intel_bufs
> checking canonical bits makes no sense anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
> Cc: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek at intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> tests/i915/api_intel_bb.c | 74 ---------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 74 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/api_intel_bb.c b/tests/i915/api_intel_bb.c
> index b41e82aa..e9883427 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/api_intel_bb.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/api_intel_bb.c
> @@ -245,77 +245,6 @@ static void lot_of_buffers(struct buf_ops *bops)
> intel_bb_destroy(ibb);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Make sure intel-bb space allocator currently doesn't enter 47-48 bit
> - * gtt sizes.
> - */
> -#define GEN8_HIGH_ADDRESS_BIT 47
> -static uint64_t gen8_canonical_addr(uint64_t address)
> -{
> - int shift = 63 - GEN8_HIGH_ADDRESS_BIT;
> -
> - return (int64_t)(address << shift) >> shift;
> -}
> -
> -static void check_canonical(struct buf_ops *bops)
> -{
> - int i915 = buf_ops_get_fd(bops), i;
> - struct intel_bb *ibb;
> - struct intel_buf *buf;
> - uint32_t offset;
> - /* Twice same addresses to verify will be unreserved in remove path */
> - uint64_t addresses[] = { 0x800000000000, 0x800000000000, 0x400000000000 };
> - uint64_t address, start, end;
> - bool supports_48bit, relocs;
> -
> - ibb = intel_bb_create(i915, PAGE_SIZE);
> - supports_48bit = ibb->supports_48b_address;
> - relocs = ibb->enforce_relocs;
> - if (!supports_48bit || relocs)
> - intel_bb_destroy(ibb);
> - igt_require_f(supports_48bit, "We need 48bit ppgtt for testing\n");
> - igt_require_f(!relocs, "We need to use allocator instead of relocations\n");
> -
> - if (debug_bb)
> - intel_bb_set_debug(ibb, true);
> -
> - intel_allocator_get_address_range(ibb->allocator_handle,
> - &start, &end);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(addresses); i++) {
> - address = addresses[i];
> -
> - if (address < start || address >= end) {
> - igt_debug("Address too big: %" PRIx64
> - ", start: %" PRIx64 ", end: %" PRIx64
> - ", skipping...\n",
> - address, start, end);
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> - offset = intel_bb_emit_bbe(ibb);
> -
> - buf = intel_buf_create(bops, 512, 512, 32, 0,
> - I915_TILING_NONE, I915_COMPRESSION_NONE);
> -
> - buf->addr.offset = address;
> - intel_bb_add_intel_buf(ibb, buf, true);
> - intel_bb_add_intel_buf(ibb, buf, true);
> -
> - igt_assert(buf->addr.offset == gen8_canonical_addr(address));
> -
> - intel_bb_exec(ibb, offset,
> - I915_EXEC_DEFAULT | I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC, true);
> -
> - /* We ensure to do unreserve and verify address can be reused */
> - intel_bb_remove_intel_buf(ibb, buf);
> - intel_buf_destroy(buf);
> - intel_bb_reset(ibb, true);
> - }
> -
> - intel_bb_destroy(ibb);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Check flags are cleared after intel_bb_reset(ibb, false);
> */
> @@ -1489,9 +1418,6 @@ igt_main_args("dpib", NULL, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
> igt_subtest("lot-of-buffers")
> lot_of_buffers(bops);
>
> - igt_subtest("check-canonical")
> - check_canonical(bops);
> -
Acked-by: Arjun Melkaveri <arjun.melkaveri at intel.com>
> igt_subtest("reset-flags")
> reset_flags(bops);
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list