[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v4 2/2] tests/kms_addfb_basic: add vendor-specific errno assertions
Lyude Paul
lyude at redhat.com
Wed Nov 18 21:23:06 UTC 2020
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
I'll go ahead and push this, thanks!
On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 10:23 -0500, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> This adjusts the check on failed calls to DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2 in
> various scenarios. According to the kernel's
> drm_mode_config_funcs.fb_create documentation, a negative return code is
> all that is required to signal failure, and different drivers return
> different errors in these scenarios.
>
> Particularly, Nouveau returns -ERANGE rather than -EINVAL in scenarios
> where the buffer is too small for the proposed configuration.
>
> In situations where Nouveau and Intel return codes diverge, split out
> the errno assertions into device-specific blocks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - Debug statement in the loop testing too-high framebuffers.
>
> tests/kms_addfb_basic.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c b/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c
> index 0ec583fe..090abe7f 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c
> @@ -281,8 +281,19 @@ static void pitch_tests(int fd)
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bad_pitches); i++) {
> igt_subtest_f("bad-pitch-%i", bad_pitches[i]) {
> f.pitches[0] = bad_pitches[i];
> - igt_assert(drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2, &f) ==
> -1 &&
> - errno == EINVAL);
> + igt_assert_eq(igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2,
> &f), -1);
> + igt_assert(errno != 0);
> + if (is_i915_device(fd)) {
> + igt_assert_eq(errno, EINVAL);
> + } else if (is_nouveau_device(fd)) {
> + if (bad_pitches[i] > 4 * 1024)
> + igt_assert_eq(errno, ERANGE);
> + else
> + igt_assert_eq(errno, EINVAL);
> + } else {
> + igt_info("Unknown vendor; errno unchecked
> (returned %i)", errno);
> + }
> + errno = 0;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -367,6 +378,8 @@ static void size_tests(int fd)
> struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 f = {};
> struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 f_16 = {};
> struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 f_8 = {};
> + struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *framebuffers[] = {&f, &f_16, &f_8};
> + int i;
>
> f.width = 1024;
> f.height = 1024;
> @@ -426,18 +439,31 @@ static void size_tests(int fd)
> f_16.height++;
> f_8.height++;
> igt_subtest("too-high") {
> - igt_assert(drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2, &f) == -1 &&
> - errno == EINVAL);
> - igt_assert(drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2, &f_16) == -1 &&
> - errno == EINVAL);
> - igt_assert(drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2, &f_8) == -1 &&
> - errno == EINVAL);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(framebuffers); i++) {
> + igt_debug("Checking framebuffer %i\n", i);
> + igt_assert_eq(igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2,
> framebuffers[i]), -1);
> + igt_assert(errno != 0);
> + if (is_i915_device(fd))
> + igt_assert_eq(errno, EINVAL);
> + else if (is_nouveau_device(fd))
> + igt_assert_eq(errno, ERANGE);
> + else
> + igt_info("Unknown vendor; errno unchecked
> (returned %i)", errno);
> + errno = 0;
> + }
> }
>
> f.handles[0] = gem_bo_small;
> igt_subtest("bo-too-small") {
> - igt_assert(drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2, &f) == -1 &&
> - errno == EINVAL);
> + igt_assert_eq(igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2, &f), -1);
> + igt_assert(errno != 0);
> + if (is_i915_device(fd))
> + igt_assert_eq(errno, EINVAL);
> + else if (is_nouveau_device(fd))
> + igt_assert_eq(errno, ERANGE);
> + else
> + igt_info("Unknown vendor; errno unchecked (returned
> %i)", errno);
> + errno = 0;
> }
>
> /* Just to check that the parameters would work. */
--
Sincerely,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
Note: I deal with a lot of emails and have a lot of bugs on my plate. If you've
asked me a question, are waiting for a review/merge on a patch, etc. and I
haven't responded in a while, please feel free to send me another email to check
on my status. I don't bite!
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list