[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_psr2_su: Skip frontbuffer test in TGL
Petri Latvala
petri.latvala at intel.com
Mon Oct 26 08:34:56 UTC 2020
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 04:11:51PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Due the commit 71c1a4998320 ("drm/i915/tgl/psr: Fix glitches when
> doing frontbuffer modifications"), frontbuffer test is expected to
> fail on TGL, so here skiping this test on TGL.
> When PSR issues is fixed the patch above will be reverted and we
> can revert this skip too.
How does the previous failure behave? I mean in the sense that what
does this skip gain? The skip will have to be cibuglog-filtered too so
no gain on that side.
Did the fail kill the machine, or is this just for saving runtime?
--
Petri Latvala
>
> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_psr2_su.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_psr2_su.c b/tests/kms_psr2_su.c
> index d549d9a31..d554052f0 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_psr2_su.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_psr2_su.c
> @@ -279,6 +279,11 @@ igt_main
>
> for (data.op = PAGE_FLIP; data.op < LAST; data.op++) {
> igt_subtest_f("%s", op_str(data.op)) {
> + if (data.op == FRONTBUFFER) {
> + const uint16_t devid = intel_get_drm_devid(data.drm_fd);
> + igt_require(!IS_TIGERLAKE(devid));
> + }
> +
> prepare(&data);
> run(&data);
> cleanup(&data);
> --
> 2.29.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list