[igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Remove libdrm in rendercopy (rev32)
Zbigniew Kempczyński
zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com
Tue Sep 1 14:49:56 UTC 2020
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:43:39AM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 04:37:16PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > ### IGT changes ###
> >
> > #### Possible regressions ####
> >
> > * igt at gem_sync@basic-store-all:
> > - shard-tglb: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
> > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8945/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_sync@basic-store-all.html
> > [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_4925/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_sync@basic-store-all.html
> > - shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4]
> > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8945/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_sync@basic-store-all.html
> > [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_4925/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_sync@basic-store-all.html
> >
> >
> > New tests
> > ---------
> >
> > New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_8945_full and IGTPW_4925_full:
> >
> > ### New IGT tests (17) ###
> >
> > * igt at api_intel_bb@check-canonical:
> > - Statuses : 5 pass(s) 2 skip(s)
> > - Exec time: [0.0, 0.01] s
> >
> > * igt at api_intel_bb@lot-of-buffers:
> > - Statuses : 7 pass(s)
> > - Exec time: [0.69, 4.54] s
> >
> > * igt at api_intel_bb@render:
> > - Statuses :
> > - Exec time: [None] s
> >
> > * igt at api_intel_bb@render-ccs:
> > - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s) 4 pass(s) 1 skip(s)
> > - Exec time: [0.0, 0.47] s
>
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_4925/shard-apl8/igt@api_intel_bb@render-ccs.html
>
> SIGSEGV on that test. And you also revealed an igt_runner bug, that
> should have been reported as CRASH, not INCOMPLETE.
>
>
>
> --
> Petri Latvala
Thanks for pointing out, I missed that. I have to check it in APL.
--
Zbigniew
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list