[igt-dev] [i-g-t] intel-ci: balcklist gem_exec_alignment at pi-shared

[Thomas Hellström]

On 12/8/21 11:54, Mastan Katragadda wrote:
> The reason for this is that it doesn't work with the dma-resv-object locking introduced
> recently in the code,and it's not going to be fixed anytime soon.
>
> drm/i915: Perform execbuffer object locking as a separate step
> To help avoid evicting already resident buffers from the batch we're
> processing, perform locking as a separate step.
>
> Link:https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip/commit/?id=5cd57f676bb946a00275408f0dd0d75dbc466d25
>
> Signed-off-by: Mastan Katragadda <mastanx.katragadda at intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>

> ---
>   tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> index ca361fde..0d307730 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ igt at sysfs_timeslice_duration@off
>   # GEM: Not worth fixing
>   ###############################################
>   igt at gen7_exec_parse@.*lri.*
> +igt at gem_exec_alignment@pi-shared
>   ###############################################
>   # There are no DRRS capable displays in CI lab
>   ###############################################