[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] intel_gpu_top: Hide unused clients

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-01 08:36:04)
> 
> On 01/02/2021 08:21, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-01 08:14:45)
> >>
> >> On 31/01/2021 03:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>> Keep new clients hidden until they utilise the GPU.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> >>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>    tools/intel_gpu_top.c | 5 ++++-
> >>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/tools/intel_gpu_top.c b/tools/intel_gpu_top.c
> >>> index 60ff62d28..66a8effa6 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/intel_gpu_top.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/intel_gpu_top.c
> >>> @@ -828,8 +828,11 @@ static void update_client(struct client *c, unsigned int pid, char *name)
> >>>                c->last[i] = val[i];
> >>>        }
> >>>    
> >>> -     c->samples++;
> >>> +     if (!c->total_runtime)
> >>> +             return;
> >>> +
> >>>        c->status = ALIVE;
> >>> +     c->samples++;
> >>>    }
> >>>    
> >>>    static void
> >>>
> >>
> >> Not sure we need to do it at this level and not instead at presentation
> >> time.
> > 
> > My goal was just presentation :(
> 
> Something like this would be presentation time:
> 
> diff --git a/tools/intel_gpu_top.c b/tools/intel_gpu_top.c
> index 60ff62d28e5d..f7c5cc3bf19f 100644
> --- a/tools/intel_gpu_top.c
> +++ b/tools/intel_gpu_top.c
> @@ -1942,6 +1942,9 @@ print_client(struct client *c, struct engines 
> *engines, double t, int lines,
>          unsigned int i;
> 
>          if (output_mode == INTERACTIVE) {
> +               if (!c->total_runtime) /* make a key toggle? */
> +                       return;
> +
>                  lines++;
> 
>                  printf("%6u %17s ", c->pid, c->print_name);
> 
> But it worries me a bit to do it by default.

I was about to argue then remembered top behaves the same (although a
process cannot exist without consuming at least some CPU resources,
whereas a client can never touch the GPU or allocate GPU memory).

But if we are borrow ideas for filtering the view from top... :)

For top, it's 'i' and there's o%CPU>x

> >> Plus, in default sort mode they would be at the end of the list,
> >> so behind the more active clients. Or you go into sort by id and they
> >> annoy you there?
> > 
> > No. I had a bunch of "Xorg" when launching steam which never became
> > anything. So I guess just a bunch of dlopen("libgl") spawing a bunch of
> > clients that we never used for anything more than gl[X]GetString, but
> > leaked the fd.
> 
> But they were at the end, so potentially even cut of if enough 
> interesting clients? Or you actually sorted by id? Or something else is 
> broken?

But they were there! Unwanted DRI3 fd, abandoned, left homeless before
being used. Even if they are used, there's still a window where we would
see "Xorg" become "realname" (granted there's still a window as we
sample pidname before totalruntime), it irks me.
-Chris