[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v17 23/31] tests/perf.c: Remove buffer from batch

[Zbigniew Kempczyński]

Currently we need to ensure intel_buf is a part of single ibb due
to fact it is acquiring address from allocator so we cannot keep
it in two separate ibbs (theoretically it is possible when different
ibbs would be in same context but it is not currently implemented).

Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
Cc: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek at intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
---
 tests/i915/perf.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/i915/perf.c b/tests/i915/perf.c
index 664fd0a94..e641d5d2d 100644
--- a/tests/i915/perf.c
+++ b/tests/i915/perf.c
@@ -3527,6 +3527,9 @@ gen8_test_single_ctx_render_target_writes_a_counter(void)
 			/* Another redundant flush to clarify batch bo is free to reuse */
 			intel_bb_flush_render(ibb0);
 
+			/* Remove intel_buf from ibb0 added implicitly in rendercopy */
+			intel_bb_remove_intel_buf(ibb0, dst_buf);
+
 			/* submit two copies on the other context to avoid a false
 			 * positive in case the driver somehow ended up filtering for
 			 * context1
@@ -3919,6 +3922,9 @@ static void gen12_single_ctx_helper(void)
 				     BO_REPORT_ID0);
 	intel_bb_flush_render(ibb0);
 
+	/* Remove intel_buf from ibb0 added implicitly in rendercopy */
+	intel_bb_remove_intel_buf(ibb0, dst_buf);
+
 	/* This is the work/context that is measured for counter increments */
 	render_copy(ibb0,
 		    &src[0], 0, 0, width, height,
@@ -3965,6 +3971,9 @@ static void gen12_single_ctx_helper(void)
 				     BO_REPORT_ID3);
 	intel_bb_flush_render(ibb1);
 
+	/* Remove intel_buf from ibb1 added implicitly in rendercopy */
+	intel_bb_remove_intel_buf(ibb1, dst_buf);
+
 	/* Submit an mi-rpc to context0 after all measurable work */
 #define BO_TIMESTAMP_OFFSET1 1032
 #define BO_REPORT_OFFSET1 256
-- 
2.26.0